John Podestas Satanic Ritual Spirit Dinners

Originally posted by BackFire
Lol this is great. I agree with Neph, this makes Podesta seem like a pretty interesting guy.

Of course, nothing actually hinting at satanic rituals in the article, just weird sounding food on the menu, which the artist claims was just normal food with funny sounding names.

Plus she says John Podesta wasn't even there.

http://www.artnews.com/2016/11/04/marina-abramovic-on-right-wing-attacks-its-absolutely-outrageous-and-ridiculous/

I'm confused as to why supposedly going to dinners with food made with sperm milk and urine makes him interesting? Has the ball dropped so low?

If you find him interesting then just go to any random park in the largest city near you. I guarantee you'll find all kinds of creepy homeless people who you'd probably find just fascinating.

There was a homeless guy in the park near me who used to have a shopping cart filled with stuff, including a rusty machete. Would you like to meet him?

1. Read. I clarified that according to the woman who held the dinner Podesta wasn't even there at the dinner. Getting invited =/= Going.

2. This dinner also apparently didn't have such things on the menu, again according to the woman who actually threw the party and was there, she says they were funny silly names. I see no evidence to the contrary other than what some right wing blog-site posted, which is where the dumb satanist angle also came from.

3. I think being invited to a dinner like this shows that he has an open and interesting mind potentially. And I find it amusing that he was invited to it. It shows that he is probably pretty respectful of strange beliefs (While not being a satanist, she is apparently a mystic of some kind) and makes me kind of like him more and seem more interesting than what you'd expect from someone who is running a presidential campaign.

4. Your non-sequitur about homeless people is pointless and a lazy attempt to demonize this whole scenario further than is logical.

Originally posted by BackFire
1. Read. I clarified that according to the woman who held the dinner Podesta wasn't even there at the dinner. Getting invited =/= Going.

2. This dinner also apparently didn't have such things on the menu, again according to the woman who actually threw the party and was there, she says they were funny silly names. I see no evidence to the contrary other than what some right wing blog-site posted, which is where the dumb satanist angle also came from.

3. I think being invited to a dinner like this shows that he has an open and interesting mind potentially. And I find it amusing that he was invited to it. It shows that he is probably pretty respectful of strange beliefs (While not being a satanist, she is apparently a mystic of some kind) and makes me kind of like him more.

4. Your non-sequitur about homeless people is pointless and a lazy attempt to demonize this whole scenario further than is logical.

Okay so then given every single thing you just said..this man is interesting...why? Since it's batshit crazy to think he's interesting because he didn't do any of these things.

So just describe to me what you felt made him interesting.

"I think being invited to a dinner like this shows that he has an open and interesting mind potentially. And I find it amusing that he was invited to it. It shows that he is probably pretty respectful of strange beliefs (While not being a satanist, she is apparently a mystic of some kind) and makes me kind of like him more and seem more interesting than what you'd expect from someone who is running a presidential campaign. "

So just the pure act of being invited to something= interesting? Okay.

That is a hilariously low bar for what is considered interesting, but I'm glad you at least explained it.

Yes, since the surrogates who run campaigns generally seem pretty boring and mild.

Originally posted by BackFire
Yes, since the surrogates who run campaigns generally seem pretty boring and mild.

Doesn't seem any more or less interesting than..being invited to mass, right? Since they think they are drinking the blood of a deity and shit.

Not really, since what you are describing is a mainstream religion and part of the norm of society.

Originally posted by BackFire
Not really, since what you are describing is a mainstream religion and part of the norm of society.

But they think they are drinking the blood of a deity and eating his body and shit.

So a less accepted idea is just..more interesting, no matter if it is just as bizarre? I can dig that.

Yes that's more or less accurate. Something on the fringe is going to be more interesting to me than engaging in a mainstream experience.

Originally posted by BackFire
Yes that's more or less accurate. Something on the fringe is going to be more interesting to me than engaging in a mainstream experience.

So technically if he believed he was in fact possessed by the main character from the latest "My Little Pony" cartoon, even that would be interesting? I like this philosophy.

Originally posted by Surtur
So technically if he believed he was in fact possessed by the main character from the latest "My Little Pony" cartoon, even that would be interesting? I like this philosophy.

Yes, would anyone not find that interesting?

Originally posted by BackFire
Yes, would anyone not find that interesting?

Do you find atheists interesting?