No excuses, just facts. The Right knows how to run a far more effective smear-machine than the Left.
Just look at Fox New's recent lie on the Hillary indictment story, by the time they said it was bs, the damage had already been done, and that was the whole point of the story, to smear:
"Fox’s Bret Baier Walks Back Flawed Reporting About “Likely” Clinton Indictment" <--click for story
There's no hate like Conservative hate.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
What is even more concerning about this post is you willing just admitted that Clinton was supposed to win and basically be given the election no matter what her past and current since are.Which means you voted for Sanders and had zero faith in him winning.
Another not-truth about me, you should really stop with the attacks when I say something you don't agree with.
I've said long before that I did not like that Clinton was seemingly being handed the nomination and I hoped for at least one strong Dem opponent to take her on. It's on record.
Originally posted by Robtard
Another not-truth about me, you should really stop with the attacks when I say something you don't agree with.I've said long before that I did not like that Clinton was seemingly being handed the nomination and I hoped for at least one strong Dem opponent to take her on. It's on record.
What attack are you talking about?
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Hillary is still going to win, if you look at the data carefully. The more pressing concern is whether the Democrats can take control of the Senate.
Yeah, I still think she will, just going to be a lot closer than I would have expected weeks ago. Cos the Right knows how to run a smear-campaign, they're exceptionally great at it.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
A person smarter then you predicts Trump will win.
At least one person smarter than me has predicted that Hillary will win too. A person smarter than me has probably bought into anti-vaccine movements, but then again, people smarter than me have supported them too. Aggregating the opinions of smart people or parsing them carefully might help, but saying that just *one* person who is smart believes something tells us nothing. Your statement is therefore inane and idiotic, as usual.