Are movie novelizations Canon or Legends?

Started by Darth Thor2 pages
Originally posted by Kurk
So then basically novels are not canon?

Novels pre-Disney purchase are not Canon.

That said the parts of the movie novelisations that don't contradict canon, probably give greater insight into the films given how closely Lucas always worked with the authors.

Well I'm looking to be somewhat of a proficient disney-canon debater in the future so if no is the straight-up answer good.

Originally posted by ares834
No, it's not. You may as well use fan fiction for one's arguments.

Except one is officially licensed material. And the other is as valid as your argument in that it's not.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Except one is officially licensed material. And the other is as valid as your argument in that it's not.

That it's officially licensed material is irrelevant to it's use in a debate. It's simply non-canon, just like the rest of the EU.

As long as Vaders Homoerotic tendencies in the ROTJ novelization are still canon I'm good.

Originally posted by Kurk
Well I'm looking to be somewhat of a proficient disney-canon debater in the future so if no is the straight-up answer good.

You won't get a straight answer, because they are and are not Canon at the same time.

Example Sidious uses FL on Luke in the movie to torture him. The movie shows this, the script tells us this and the novel tells us this.

So it's all correct in what is shown, which is what was said about as long as they align with what is shown on screen it's ok.

Of course you don't really need to use the novels since aligning with what is seen on screen you may as well just watch the movies, at best they might just give a tad more information in the scene.

Originally posted by ares834
That it's officially licensed material is irrelevant to it's use in a debate. It's simply non-canon, just like the rest of the EU.

Well it's relevant in that Canon just copies and pastes a whole load of pages from it.

E.g. It's taken all the Lightsaber forms with just a few minor adjustments.

This is a bit complicated. I'll just show a video from YouTube of how novelizations of Star Wars movies can be used in debates.

YouTube video

The ROTS movie poorly portrayed the scene were Palpatine killed Jedis. The novelization however explains this in a way that would make sense to all.

I always laughed at people citing the novels. Another confirmation I was correct and the nerds quoting the books were not. Point Quan.