My Character Rankings

Originally posted by ares834

?

Quotes that clarify something I'm not certain on or affirm positions that I already had I accept. Ones that directly contradict established limits are thrown out.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Do you want the quote?

Sure.

Okay.
It is in some book. Go and find it yourself 🙂

Lmao. Noice.

Not overly impressive, as Luke frees himself easily, but still noice.
"His hearing faded and his head began to spin, and he saw Jacen, one hand still raised to keep Luke pinned, sneering and taking his time rising."
-Inferno

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
[b]Galen Marek

Solid Feats

Force

Flipped over a 40 meter ship.
Logically grew in power after that point.
Pinned Luke Skywalker to a wall for a brief period.
Collapsed a cave by unleashing a blast of Force lightning.
Was stated by both Luke and a canonized quote to have surpassed Vader.

Lightsaber Combat

Demonstrated blatant superiority to all lightsaber combatants in his era barring Luke. [/B]

Glad you commented tbh because the timer on that edit almost ran out.

Also, you should add besting Kyle's strike team and beating/statlemting Jaina while injured to Lightsaber combat.

👆 those are some phenomenal feats

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
?

Quotes that clarify something I'm not certain on or affirm positions that I already had I accept. Ones that directly contradict established limits are thrown out.

I'm laughing because it's not canon 🙂

Especially as he was injured and distracted against Kyle, and half-dead against Jaina, lol.

Originally posted by ares834
I'm laughing because it's not canon 🙂

Oh yeah. I forgot you and some others are really nitpicky with those terms.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Especially as he was injured and distracted against Kyle, and half-dead against Jaina, lol.

That's pretty much encompassed in > lightsaber combatant then anybody bar Luke.

Plus the timer ran out. 🙂

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Oh yeah. I forgot you and some others are really nitpicky with those terms.

Nitpicky? It’s pretty damn important when it comes to discussions like these.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
?

Quotes that clarify something I'm not certain on or affirm positions that I already had I accept. Ones that directly contradict established limits are thrown out.

You're referring to Disney canon right?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'm sorry, but that seems like a really arbitrary way of counting quotes.

Not really. If it was already evident by established limits then it just affirms the position. If it clarifies an ambiguous comparison then all the better.

Quotes that are outright contradicted by established limits are obviously unusable. I mean Bane > Vitiate? Lmao.

To me its sounds like what you're saying is "If the quote supports my opinion I accept it, if I don't care enough one way or the other I accept it, if it goes against what i'd believe otherwise I don't accept it"

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
You're referring to Disney canon right?

No. I was referring to "EU canon".

Originally posted by Emperordmb
To me its sounds like what you're saying is "If the quote supports my opinion I accept it, if I don't care enough one way or the other I accept it, if it goes against what i'd believe otherwise I don't accept it"

It's not about caring or bias. It's about math.

If a demonstrated limit occurs and they are shown to be below another person's demonstrated limit and then that's confirmed that's good.

If a limit is not established for a comparison between two people then a quote establishes a base limit ( > or < ) at least greater by a minimum margin. At least lesser by a minimum margin.

If limits are demonstrated and one is shown to be superior to another and a quote contradicts that then I side over the established limits rather then the source in question.