How good will a Trump Presidency actually be?

Started by Surtur20 pages

I suppose technically someone laughing at you is catching a lol.

My inbox Surt, let's not beat around the bush here.

Spoiler:
also, was actually serious about the reporting, expect a ban.

Beat around the bush? Bro we both know you don't like bushes.

Nah don't mind a bit of bush... in the right places.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nah don't mind a bit of bush... in the right places.

Where is the wrong place to have one?

Originally posted by Robtard
Just like I was reported yesterday for "attacking nationality" (I didn't), Surt? Lolz.
He's from Poland. You said Pollock. So shut up. sneer
Originally posted by Beniboybling
nah I got TI banned and you are next

enjoy your final days on these boards.

Yeah, no. 😐

My cat could totally beat down those two cats.

You can tell by the cold stare in her eyes that she has killed before and will most likely kill again.

Given the way you guys go back and forth at each other, are you sure that's not a selfie?

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Given the way you guys go back and forth at each other, are you sure that's not a selfie?

Wouldn't it be awesome if that was a selfie? Since I'd be a cat with psychic powers that can levitate a phone above its head and take a selfie with it.

Just when I think to give him a little praise he shows his true face again. Oh trump.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/07/trumps-latest-tweet-attacks-union-chief-at-indianapolis-carrier-plant.html

Thin skinned man.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Just when I think to give him a little praise he shows his true face again. Oh trump.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/07/trumps-latest-tweet-attacks-union-chief-at-indianapolis-carrier-plant.html

Thin skinned man.

What were you going to give him praise for?

Originally posted by Surtur
What were you going to give him praise for?
Saving the jobs but the numbers were exaggerated and the details a sham. He's now attacking the workers and the union rep. Same old Donald. Expect more rage tweets in the next four years.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Saving the jobs but the numbers were exaggerated and the details a sham. He's now attacking the workers and the union rep. Same old Donald. Expect more rage tweets in the next four years.

I understand. So are you saying what makes you not like him is that he exaggerated the numbers or is it that you feel the true numbers wouldn't have been worth praise if Trump had been upfront about them in the first place?

Originally posted by Surtur
I understand. So are you saying what makes you not like him is that he exaggerated the numbers or is it that you feel the true numbers wouldn't have been worth praise if Trump had been upfront about them in the first place?
He is full of shit. He's always been full of shit. I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt but once again it's all been exaggerated and lied to praise himself and when anyone clarified the truth. He rage tweeted at the guy and even attacked the workers.

Yeah, he does need to stop exaggerating shit.

Frankly he needs to just stop using twitter.

So Obama has set up some kind of study to look into Russia's potentially influencing our recent election. I don't necessarily have a problem with it, but then shouldn't we also being examining our own meddling in the affairs of other countries? Isn't that the right thing to do since we've suddenly become so concerned with upholding the integrity of elections?

Otherwise it makes us look hypocritical and like we only care about meddling when we are on the receiving end. Of course I know we won't actually do this.

Remember when I posted the article on how the Carrier deal really wasn't all that great in reality and you people attacked? I do. LoLz. You Trump fair-weather fans crack me up.

#TrumpFairWeatherFans

No, I don't. I remember you posted an article where Sarah Palin said it was bad. Then you said she wasn't the only one. Then I asked you if you thought there were also people who thought it was a good deal. You asked for links. I gave them. Which pretty much ended the conversation as far as I recall. In fact I believe one of the links I gave was about how the White House praised it.

And you don't remember the Bernie article? It's the one where you went 'Lol, Washington Post!' as a means to dismiss it because you didn't bother to click the link to see that my bro Sanders was the one who wrote it.

#selectivememory