I figured he has to be trolling because I've quite literally had discussions with him about violence perpetrated against Trump supporters. Both during the election and in the few weeks since the election.
In other news, places like the Washington Post are saying Russia not only hacked the DNC, but the RNC as well..but didn't post any RNC emails.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?utm_term=.ce0220efd3c9
If you read the article you will notice..no actual evidence is shown lol. The Washington Post genuinely seems to want us to just take their word for it.
Then notice the article says this:
"For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. "
So essentially..we're supposed to just take this officials word for it because..reasons. Also isn't it strange how the WP suddenly got a hold of information from some secret study? Weren't these people whining about stuff getting leaked? So do you think anyone will call people out for allowing this to get leaked? Or will they pull the whole "I'm only upset when I don't benefit" thing they love to do. Will anyone go after the CIA? Doubtful lol.
Curious to see if this case will stir up more liberal hypocrisy. I'd love to see if they will be consistent in the stuff they get upset over.