Hillary Supporters Rage Across America!

Originally posted by Robtard
That's fine to be that way, they're people who are anti-Trump but not pro-Clinton.

Pople gloating over Trump's win though when those same people were previously not Trump supporters is what Ben mentioned and I commented on. The fairweather fans.

People gloating at the butthurt doesn't actually mean they are fans of Trump though.

There is a difference between laughing at peoples reaction to Trump's victory and actually suddenly deciding you support him and actually want him as president.

If it were up to me I'd remove him from the position of president.

Which is a result of Hillary losing.

Just look at it as the Deplorable People of this Country rose up and pointed out who the REAL DEPLORABLE groups are.

The Fear and Hate mongering Leftists.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
The worst part being that these supposed "anti-Trump" folk insist on calling anyone who says a bad word about his presidency as "hurr durr butt hurt".

You seem to genuinely enjoy just digging that hole deeper and deeper. First off you put Anti-Trump in quotes as if people aren't really Anti-Trump. I've made it crystal clear for a long time that I didn't feel we had any good choices in this election. I have not suddenly decided Trump will be the best president ever. What I have done is merely express hope that he might be genuinely trying to do some good and you can't handle it, hence people calling you butthurt.

Plus at this moment the most Trump has done is lay out what he wants to do in office. He has not even taken office yet and he won't until January. There is no "Trump presidency" yet.

Sorry but you don't get to act like a child while pretending to be a sensible adult.

Did you realize how hilarious this statement actually sounds before you posted it? I'm genuinely wondering how you could type that with a straight face.

tyrant, kenya, birth certificate, secret muslim, death panels, jade helm, fema death camps. but now all of the sudden that's just inappropriate behavior. #convenient

I feel like we owe it to you to give you another shot at posting a picture. We'll just call that a practice run.

Originally posted by Surtur
You seem to genuinely enjoy just digging that hole deeper and deeper. First off you put Anti-Trump in quotes as if people aren't really Anti-Trump. I've made it crystal clear for a long time that I didn't feel we had any good choices in this election. I have not suddenly decided Trump will be the best president ever. What I have done is merely express hope that he might be genuinely trying to do some good and you can't handle it, hence people calling you butthurt.

Plus at this moment the most Trump has done is lay out what he wants to do in office. He has not even taken office yet and he won't until January. There is no "Trump presidency" yet.

And the issue here isn't that you don't support Trump, it's that bashing people who are critical of him is indeed, hypocritical.

And if he turns out to be a hunkdory President, that's great, but don't expect me to become an apologist for his blunders in the meantime. In fact, I imagine the every present reminder that the general population will ridicule him at the slightest misstep will do wonders to reign in his less desirable qualities.

Did you realize how hilarious this statement actually sounds before you posted it? I'm genuinely wondering how you could type that with a straight face.

Liberals demonstrating their true colors on the streets. They are liberals only in label, more like a bunch of intolerant freaks.

😂

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Just a bit of banter dear, don't take it the wrong way. 🙂

And the issue here isn't that you don't support Trump, it's that bashing people who are critical of him is indeed, hypocritical.

I never said people couldn't be critical of him. I myself have been critical of him.

I'm saying it makes no sense whatsoever to act upset because someone was talking about how he seems to be attempting to change.

And if he turns out to be a hunkdory President, that's great, but don't expect me to become an apologist for his blunders in the meantime. In fact, I imagine the every present reminder that the general population will ridicule him at the slightest misstep will do wonders to reign in his less desirable qualities.

But what specific blunders have I been apologizing for?

Actually, I type everything into this boards with an amused smirk. 🙂

I'm just wondering if you realized that some of the Hilary supporters are indeed behaving in a way that resembles children pretending they are all grown up.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Liberals demonstrating their true colors on the streets. They are liberals only in label, more like a bunch of intolerant freaks.

That's another thing, people can give whatever reasons they want for some of the more extreme reactions. Some more valid than others. However the thing is..liberals basically have acted like they are above this kind of behavior.

Now they've shown the entire world that isn't the case at all. They are their own worst enemies at this point.

Originally posted by Surtur

It just seems to me from the way you respond that you are under the impression that I am Pro Trump as opposed to merely Anti-Clinton.

The problem with your "butt-hurt" jokes is that you think that people upset over Trump's win don't have any sort of stake in things, when in reality there are millions of Muslim immigrants and dreamers covered by DAPA, many in graduate and medical school, others already on track for academic and professional success, who have honestly put a lot more into our country than your average redneck Trump supporter, who have good reason to fear that Trump won't have their interests at heart.

That you whine about SJW's and deleted emails while then laughing at people for fearing for their very ability to live in this country is what makes you look like a prick.

And yeah, we get that you're "anti-Clinton" and not "pro-Trump", but in all these years you've never been able to articulate who Clinton is going to be more likely to deport, who Clinton is going to incite hate crimes against, and how many more tons of CO2 we're going to dump into the atmosphere on her watch. Your priorities were based on privilege - yeah, I used that word, and given the disparate impacts we're talking about, it's perfectly fair.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
The problem with your "butt-hurt" jokes is that you think that people upset over Trump's win don't have any sort of stake in things, when in reality there are millions of Muslim immigrants and dreamers covered by DAPA, many in graduate and medical school, others already on track for academic and professional success, who have honestly put a lot more into our country than your average redneck Trump supporter, who have good reason to fear that Trump won't have their interests at heart.

But I never said they don't have any stake in some things. I said I feel some people have been over reacting. I also admitted I was wrong about some stuff and then said I can understand some of the fear from people.

That you whine about SJW's and deleted emails while then laughing at people for fearing for their very ability to live in this country is what makes you look like a prick.

Yes, I don't like the corruption of the Clintons. I also can't help but find the hypocrisy of some liberals amusing.

Also you know what? Maybe if people like you didn't act like smug little pricks going into this election I would have a bit more empathy for you. But you did, so I don't 🙂

And yeah, we get that you're "anti-Clinton" and not "pro-Trump", but in all these years you've never been able to articulate who Clinton is going to be more likely to deport, who Clinton is going to incite hate crimes against, and how many more tons of CO2 we're going to dump into the atmosphere on her watch. Your priorities were based on privilege - yeah, I used that word, and given the disparate impacts we're talking about, it's perfectly fair.

But I've never claimed Clinton would deport people or do any of that stuff. So why would I attempt to articulate it? In fact I have made several comments about how I feel she'd try to prevent people from being deported.

I never said she would incite any hate crimes at all. Nor did I say hate crimes were okay. I never commented on her plans for friggin CO2 stuff. You act like we had some kind of discussion where I said all these things and decided not to back them up. Though why does this exactly shock you because this election hasn't really been about policies, has it? Both sides saw to that.

Like I said, perhaps if you had taken the time to be less of a smug person..but meh why cry over spillt milk. Especially if Lena Dunham is nearby she can certainly provide you with some MOOre

Sorry, I just couldn't resist.

In other words, you completely dodge my request for you to explain how Clinton would be tangibly worse for humanity than Trump, because it seems clear that your position was purely emotional, .i.e. you just didn't like Clinton very much.

People in real life have real problems that should've weighed more on your mind than that.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
In other words, you completely dodge my request for you to explain how Clinton would be tangibly worse for humanity than Trump, because it seems clear that your position was purely emotional, .i.e. you just didn't like Clinton very much.

People in real life have real problems that should've weighed more on your mind than that.

Huffington Post, a left leaning press organization, did publish an article about her warmongerness:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-brenner/is-hillary-a-warmonger_b_10440976.html

"The specific criticisms directed at HRC from those who find her too hawkish are well-known. They include her vote in favor of the Iraq war; her cheer-leading for the GWOT in all its aspects; her collaboration with the Gates-led faction to push Obama into a major Afghan escalation; her advocacy of direct military action in Syria to unseat Assad; her unbending attitude toward containing Iran even after the nuclear accord; and her bellicose language in calling Putin another “Hitler’ after Russia’s seizure of the Crimea. Hillary’s big foreign policy address at the Council on Foreign Relations reinforced the impression of a hard-liner across-the-board who thinks primarily in terms of power balances and its deployment. In addition, her full-throated endorsement of Bibi Netanyahu’s actions left no room for accommodating the concerns of those realists who see the United States as inflicting unnecessary harm on itself through its unqualified backing of everything Israel does."

She's even said she would obliterate Iran over something kind of small, as well...which I found childish and insecure dictator-y.

Can't edit the above.

Oh well.

What I meant to say was something like global warming is less tangible to people than a person who is a warmonger. So in their eyes, she's more dangerous than Trump.

As far as who is more dangerous...?

We can draw some conclusions perhaps in a year or so.

Do you honestly think Trump can single handedly plunge us into a runaway greenhouse effect?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
In other words, you completely dodge my request for you to explain how Clinton would be tangibly worse for humanity than Trump, because it seems clear that your position was purely emotional, .i.e. you just didn't like Clinton very much.

People in real life have real problems that should've weighed more on your mind than that.

You didn't make any requests of me. You said I failed to articulate stuff about her deporting and shit. I never said that is why I didn't want her to be president.

I never said her views on climate change made me not want her in that office.

Also a lot of people have purely emotional positions in this. Since Trump himself has not actually enacted any kind of program as of yet to deny people their rights or anything like that, we need to wait and see. I know you will talk about Trump supporters as well, but I already acknowledged that I can understand why they'd fear the more extreme Trump supporters.

@Dadudemon: the warmongering thing is one of the only legitimate cases for Trump, yeah.

Originally posted by Surtur
You didn't make any requests of me.

Uh I did, but anyway, I'm making it now.

You spent the last several months wishing for a Trump presidency, and yet never articulate how that would be better than a Clinton one. And yeah, I know you don't like Trump - but you still wanted him to win.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Can't edit the above.

Oh well.

What I meant to say was something like global warming is less tangible to people than a person who is a warmonger. So in their eyes, she's more dangerous than Trump.

As far as who is more dangerous...?

We can draw some conclusions perhaps in a year or so.

Do you honestly think Trump can single handedly plunge us into a runaway greenhouse effect?

Yes, I say we wait and see what happens. I don't feel panicking is helping.

Plus every time I try to not be amused by certain liberals behavior I see articles like this:

Amber Ruffin Invites White People to 'Join the Fun' on Seth Meyers

People are literally losing their minds lol. Come on media, I really want them to continue reporting on stories like this, but I'll also acknowledge it really would be better for the liberals if they did not write stories about this kind of stuff.