Originally posted by quanchi112
Vader isn't as strong as Opress that's for sure.
Originally posted by Ziggystardust
You know, I could actually see a good enough argument in this instance from someone like ILS, but his pride won't let him concede Maul's degradation past TCW. Savage could honestly put up a fight, and win.
Originally posted by Ursumeles
Never said otherwise. Maul > Opress > Vader 😬
Originally posted by BeniboyblingOpress was a physical beast Vader isn't. Maul is more powerful and a better duelist but Opress was the guy with the physical strength. Na, you don't know how to be concrete when it comes to your definitions.
Vader is far more powerful in the Force and thanks to his cybernetic enhancements should be at least as physically capable, yeah.Again, Savage isn't even as strong as Maul, who as I recall, failed to overpower Ahsoka with his supposed Vader+ strength. (Or even Kanan, kek.)
This is a laughable argument, yeah.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on ?
Why do you think Savage is physically stronger?
Originally posted by Rebel95When did Vader crush a man's skull with his bare hands ? Kanan isn't a big person and this doesn't look impressive at all when compared to Opress and his strength portrayal.
Vader crushing a man's skull with is bare hands
Vader casually picking up Kanan with one arm and throwing him aside, as well as Ezra
The fact that Vader usually only needs the strength of one arm to duel with
I can think of plenty other examples if you want more.Why do you think Savage is physically stronger?
Vader is far more skilled than Opress. If you don't think the rest of his body is aiding in the fest you're wrong.
His consistent portrayal while Vader is a guy on his backside getting railed on by an unimpressive Luke.