Originally posted by Darth Thor
Think you might have these 2 the wrong way around.
Not necessarily. Dooku in Canon hasn't shown a particular susceptibility to strength. It wasn't really the case in Legends either (despite what people claim), but in Canon, since the films are the only canon iterations of the Saga, you have him matching Yoda/Anakin in saberlocks for 10+ seconds. Heck, he actually had Anakin on the backfoot in the saberlock until Anakin became enraged. Vader's strength won't be a particularly big problem.
Dooku contending with Obi-Wan/Anakin and Yoda is also beyond any of Vader's dueling feats.
Originally posted by SunRazerDooku contending with Obi-Wan/Anakin and Yoda is also beyond any of Vader's dueling feats.
Well Vader is Anakin, but more powerful in the Force (in canon), and with Grievous type machine strength to boot. So that doesn't make much sense.
In terms of duelling feats, depends how much Anakin's feat count for Vader. But we know even as Machine Vader, he's owned Kanan one handed, and we also know he's overpowered Filoni's pet powerhouse.
Originally posted by SunRazer
The website disagrees.
I'm not convinced it does. Been over that with Beni already.
Aside from Mortis, going by feats, Vader is almost definitely more powerful than he was as Anakin- crushing an AT-AT, redirecting torpedoes from X-Wings, and crushing X-Wings.
Originally posted by SunRazer
Owning Kanan isn't that great. Overpowering Ahsoka on a potential nexus is good but not beyond Dooku's showings.
It was the level of ownage over Kanan that was impressive.
Bear in mind Maul couldn't overpower her. Not being "beyond" Dooku's showings is still being on par with him in Sabers, but that still makes Vader > Dooku in an all out.