Maul vs Eldra Kaitis

Originally posted by MythLord
Pelicans are our lords and saviors, you Maul-wanking piece of filth. You deviating from their natural order is the only disgusting thing on this forum.

Well, that and Syndicate.

😂

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
After learning a young Jedi Padawan named Eldra Kaitis has fallen into the hands of a crime lord, Maul seizes an opportunity to test his skills against a real Jedi but also maybe turn someone else to the dark side.

LMAO

^ Which only means Maul is a Padawan himself. What is the Sith term for Padawan?

Look at the hyperbole, dude.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
What is the Sith term for Padawan?

Quanchi.

Nah that might be the Sith name for Troll though.

Apprentice.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Apprentice.

I mean in that case he was still an apprentice in TPM, so what's the embarrassment in losing to a Jedi apprentice?

The thing of that is in TPM, Sidious also said.

"You have been well trained my apprentice, they will be no match for you."

In regards to him fighting Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan.

So he clearly wasn't an apprentice anymore by TPM as far as skill would go if he's able to take on both a Jedi Master and a Jedi Knight(pretty much as Obi-Wan was stated as being ready for the Jedi trials).

Vader was also considered an apprentice in RotS, despite being above Jedi Master level.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
The thing of that is in TPM, Sidious also said.

"You have been well trained my apprentice, they will be no match for you."

In regards to him fighting Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan.

So he clearly wasn't an apprentice anymore by TPM as far as skill would go if he's able to take on both a Jedi Master and a Jedi Knight(pretty much as Obi-Wan was stated as being ready for the Jedi trials).

Well there you have it then.

Both Maul and Kenobi were well trained apprentices in TPM. So what's with the "he lost to a padawan" nonsense? They're both about the same age as well.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Well there you have it then.

Both Maul and Kenobi were well trained apprentices in TPM. So what's with the "he lost to a padawan" nonsense? They're both about the same age as well.

He didn't, the fight was over so regarding to dueling, so no Maul never lost to a Padawan(Jedi Knight) Obi-Wan. He got cheap shotted due to him being arrogant/overconfident.

In the overall grand scheme, if you really wanna push it....yeah he did lose. But the fight was over and done with.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Quanchi.

Hey Quan, I guess the poll indeed suggests you've managed to convince almost everyone on this forum that Maul is as powerful as you claim. 👆

There's a distinction to be made between being a Banite Sith apprentice, and an apprentice-level Sith. Vader, Dooku and Maul are all apprentices to Sidious, forming half of the RoT, but are also fully fledged Sith Lords.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
He didn't, the fight was over so regarding to dueling, so no Maul never lost to a Padawan(Jedi Knight) Obi-Wan. He got cheap shotted due to him being arrogant/overconfident.

In the overall grand scheme, if you really wanna push it....yeah he did lose. But the fight was over and done with.

Yeah plus he never could have competed for such a prolonged period or won in the end without the presence of his Master there.

Originally posted by Petrus
Hey Quan, I guess the poll indeed suggests you've managed to convince almost everyone on this forum that Maul is as powerful as you claim. 👆

I swear that guy's damaged Maul's reputation here more than Filoni.

Originally posted by Darth Thor

I swear that guy's damaged Maul's reputation here more than Filoni.

I know, that's why I find his claims that he 'raised Maul's reputation around here' hilarious.

Originally posted by Petrus
Hey Quan, I guess the poll indeed suggests you've managed to convince almost everyone on this forum that Maul is as powerful as you claim. 👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do not care ehat cowards and ignoramuses such as ILS and D. Thor think. I back my claims while D. Thor doesn't and ILS doesn't actively back Maul.

That's not true, but that also has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. You claimed that Maul's reputation was raised because, and it's pretty clear that's just not the case. Also, pretty hypocritical for you to say, 'you don't care about their opinions' when you act all high and mighty when people agree with your stances on Maul.