Popular vote: who really won it?

Originally posted by Silent Master
LOL!!!

BTW, are you still raping 16 kids a week?

is this one of those things where i have to deny it or else it's true?

anyway, you stressed many times that you're anti-clinton, so your support/non-support for trump will not unpaint you from this corner. best to just let it go.

Just using your own debating tactic.

Yet, you avoid stating that you aren't still raping 16 kids a week. why don't you just lie about it and say you've stopped, like everyone else does?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just using your own debating tactic.

Yet, you avoid stating that you aren't still raping 16 kids a week. why don't you just lie about it and say you've stopped, like everyone else does?

at least you're applying comedy to your desperate shift in topic. you are rabidly anti-clinton. pretty obvious you would have an entirely different opinion of the EC if it had contradicted the PV while favoring her.

an honest answer for my part? i certainly wouldn't have gone out to march in the streets if it was trump who only got beat by the EC, but i still would have seen the unfairness of it. then again we'll never know, since the whole point of the EC is to inflate white rural voters while marginalizing others.

Using your debating tactics is me applying comedy, sounds like you're admitting that your tactics are a joke. But on the topic, as I'm anti-Trump and anti-Clinton, my argument would remain the same either way.

If the roles were reversed and Hilary got the EC votes and Trump got the PV, Trump supporters would make a big deal about it. My point is, the only reason this is an issue is because roughly half of American voters didn't get their preferred President. If the EC is ever going to be disbanded or adjusted, it's going to take a HUGE movement by voters from every side to make it happen. Basically, it won't happen because the side that wins regardless of circumstances will stay quiet. Just MO.

Originally posted by meep-meep
If the roles were reversed and Hilary got the EC votes and Trump got the PV, Trump supporters would make a big deal about it. My point is, the only reason this is an issue is because roughly half of American voters didn't get their preferred President. If the EC is ever going to be disbanded or adjusted, it's going to take a HUGE movement by voters from every side to make it happen. Basically, it won't happen because the side that wins regardless of circumstances will stay quiet. Just MO.

They probably would, just means that as a Sanders supporter, I'd have someone to make fun of either way.

Originally posted by meep-meep
If the roles were reversed and Hilary got the EC votes and Trump got the PV, Trump supporters would make a big deal about it. My point is, the only reason this is an issue is because roughly half of American voters didn't get their preferred President. If the EC is ever going to be disbanded or adjusted, it's going to take a HUGE movement by voters from every side to make it happen. Basically, it won't happen because the side that wins regardless of circumstances will stay quiet. Just MO.

Yes but you have to admit if the roles were reversed most of the people who voted Clinton who want the EC gone would be praising it if it was the only thing that saved them from Trump.

That is the first thing that goes through my mind whenever I see someone upset. I say this as someone who voted Trump and still wants the EC gone.

http://www.cnn.com/election/results/president

Clinton is currently leading according to CNN.

It takes time for all the votes to come in. We won't know for sure for a month or more probably, if that.

odd how margin keeps growing for hillary while at a crawl for the don. pure coincidence i'm sure.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
odd how margin keeps growing for hillary while at a crawl for the don. pure coincidence i'm sure.

I suppose it could be coincidence, or just that more people voted for her?

The good news is that it's irrelevant, since Trump got enough votes in the places that counted.

I mean, what kind of dick says one state counts more than the other? Rich people, amirite?

Originally posted by Silent Master
They probably would, just means that as a Sanders supporter, I'd have someone to make fun of either way.

I like the way you think. 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
Yes but you have to admit if the roles were reversed most of the people who voted Clinton who want the EC gone would be praising it if it was the only thing that saved them from Trump.

That is the first thing that goes through my mind whenever I see someone upset. I say this as someone who voted Trump and still wants the EC gone.

Kudos to you. There would be a few black sheep. It's only my opinion but I believe it's a valid one.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with you. I do however agree with 2012 trump.

Originally posted by Surtur
I suppose it could be coincidence, or just that more people voted for her?

The good news is that it's irrelevant, since Trump got enough votes in the places that counted.

I mean, what kind of dick says one state counts more than the other? Rich people, amirite?

Prertty much.

Lets say we get rid of the college. Wouldn't candidates just ignore low yield states, over the one's with huge populations?

Originally posted by cdtm
Prertty much.

Lets say we get rid of the college. Wouldn't candidates just ignore low yield states, over the one's with huge populations?

probably. not a justification for inflating their votes imo.

Yea, but it's only your opinion because Hillary lost the EC.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yea, but it's only your opinion because Hillary lost the EC.

you already played that card. try harder, troll.

It's not a card, it's the truth.

nah, it's just your empty accusation. weren't you just accusing me of doing exactly that and whining about it? baby

Feel free to prove me wrong by quoting a pre-Hillary loss post where you said anything about the EC being wrong or a bad idea.