One of the most annoying things to me about TYT is their blatant anti-Christian bias. It's retarded. As a Christian, I'll admit that traditional Christian theology is absolutely flawed. But holy shit they take any issue that even vaguely relates to Christianity and use it as a piece of anti-Christian propaganda.
Child Bride Problem in the US=****ing Stupid Christians with their stupid book have rules about sex outside of marriage which are ridiculous to the rational world, therefore Christian faith is the same as wanting children to get married.
Pro-life Stance=They don't give a shit about life, it's all about controlling women's sexuality... (even though there's no personal benefit for any man to gain from outlawing abortion and valuing life isn't remotely the same as being a sexist) KEEP YOUR RELIGION OUT OF MY LIIIIFFFFEEEE
Islamic Terrorism=BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHRISTIAN TERRORISM!!!
It's retarded because if you look up "TYT Christian" all the videos are negative and bashing Christianity, whereas if you look up "TYT Muslim" all the videos are positive.
Of course they also draw weird conclusions about other things to fit their narrative as well. For example when discussing the KKK, Ana said that racial purity was only a doctrine of the KKK so men could control women's sexuality... WHERE THE **** DID THAT COME FROM?! I can't believe TYT is so insane I feel obligated to defend the KKK against Ana's ridiculous claim that their racism is also inherently sexist.
Okay so Don Lemon, from CNN, has said he does not know ANYONE who has put out a story to intentionally deceive someone:
So CNN intentionally deceived people when it came to the Milwaukee riots and the girl calling for "peace". So, in other words: bullshit lol. He is full of shit as always.
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay so Don Lemon, from CNN, has said he does not know ANYONE who has put out a story to intentionally deceive someone:So CNN intentionally deceived people when it came to the Milwaukee riots and the girl calling for "peace". So, in other words: bullshit lol. He is full of shit as always.
He did not like the fact that he called out the useless and silly idea that protecting the Trump family cost money, right?
So every member of the Trump family is supposed to end all of the things they do in their lives because their dad/husband became president, right?
Originally posted by dadudemon
He did not like the fact that he called out the useless and silly idea that protecting the Trump family cost money, right?So every member of the Trump family is supposed to end all of the things they do in their lives because their dad/husband became president, right?
Well Obama didn't seem to go out of his way to protect some members of his family. Like that half brother or whatever working in that liquer store. Obama apperanlty didn't give a shit about him.
Here is a perfect example of why people don't take the left seriously anymore, and it also shows the problem isn't specific to just America:
s Lionel Shriver made light of identity, I had no choice but to walk out on her
So be ready to laugh, I feel I should point out this is NOT satire, a real adult human being wrote this in a serious manner. So some of the best parts:
"We were 20 minutes into the speech when I turned to my mother, sitting next to me in the front row.
“Mama, I can’t sit here,” I said, the corners of my mouth dragging downwards. “I cannot legitimise this …”
Rowan Hisayo Buchanan: ‘Pain shape-shifts down the generations’
Read more
My mother’s eyes bore into me, urging me to remain calm, to follow social convention. I shook my head, as if to shake off my lingering doubts.
As I stood up, my heart began to race. I could feel the eyes of the hundreds of audience members on my back: questioning, querying, judging."
Lmao, "I can't legitimize this mama!". The mother appropriately reacts as if this chick is nuts.
"I turned to face the crowd, lifted up my chin and walked down the main aisle, my pace deliberate. “Look back into the audience,” a friend had texted me moments earlier, “and let them see your face.”
The faces around me blurred. As my heels thudded against they grey plastic of the flooring, harmonising with the beat of the adrenaline pumping through my veins, my mind was blank save for one question.
“How is this happening?”
Lol, notice she had time to text her friend and tell her she was going to walk out, before she walked out? Also lol@ the "let them see your face".
"“Can you believe,” Shriver asked at the beginning of her speech, “that these students were so sensitive about the wearing of sombreros?”
The audience, compliant, chuckled. I started looking forward to the point in the speech where she was to subvert the argument.
It never came."
Lol so notice that she seems to think the crowd couldn't possibly find it funny and that they are just "complying" by laughing. In other words they only laughed because they felt they had to.
"As the chuckles of the audience swelled around me, reinforcing and legitimising the words coming from behind the lectern, I breathed in deeply, trying to make sense of what I was hearing. The stench of privilege hung heavy in the air, and I was reminded of my “place” in the world."
The "stench of privilege" lol.
"My own mother, as we walked away from the tent, suggested that perhaps I was being too sensitive. Perhaps … or perhaps that is the result of decades of being told to be quiet, and accept our place. So our conversation then turned to intent. What was Shriver’s intent when she chose to discuss her distaste for the concept of cultural appropriation? Was it to build bridges, to further our intellect, to broaden horizons of what is possible?"
This is the last bit from the article I'll post. But yeah, even poor momma is confused as to what this accomplishes.
Okay damn this was brutal, I almost feel sorry for the guest, almost:
"I'm making the mistake of taking you seriously" lol. Millenials need to put the word out on college campuses that they should avoid appearing on Tucker's show unless they want to be humiliated in front of millions of people.
I too am curious at what Trump is supposedly going to do to gays? What legislation is this person referring to , does anyone know?
My comment wasn't just to Surtur, there are a few Milophiles in here, though I suspect they'll soon distance themselves and pretend they never were. But lolz, his fascination with Tucker is both hilarious and disturbing.
Milo has issues:
But in the tape, the fast-talking polemicist is clear that he has no problem with older men abusing children as young as 13, which he then conflates with relationships between older and younger gay men who are of consenting age.
“No, no, no. You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means,†Mr. Yiannopoulos says on the tape, in which he is talking to radio hosts in a video chat. “Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty,†he adds, dismissing the fact that 13-year-olds are children.
The notion of consent, he says, is "arbitrary and oppressive."-snip