Gambit vs Cyclops

scenario 1 they use their power to the fullest.
scenario 2, you guessed it only h2h no blasts just ass wooping. gambit doesnt have his staff.

Round 1 definitely gambit (new son gambit is his powers to his fullest)

1. All Scott has to do is look at him. Insta-win.
2. Scott wins again.

I'm a Gambit fan. He wins both, no bias. I think he's underrated

Cyclops has his way with Gambit.

H2h only? What makes people so confident Scott takes that one?

this is a good one

im a gambit fan and I cant stand scott

blowup

but I have to say scott probably takes both of these unless there is an environmental advantage.

people believe cyclops can take gambit H2H? i am not against it but what feats does he have of only h2h

He does have a few.

Gambit relies on his staff too much.

Scenario one gambit decks him with new son/death Powers

I don't see scott beating him in h2h either