Originally posted by Bashar Teg
still avoiding the point of steve bannon and the recent alt-right self-unmasking. how expected, coward.
Lol saying both sides have racism isn't avoiding the point. Not when some d-bag tries to pull the "you're on the side of neo nazi's!" yeah, it's definitely going to be pointed out racism exists on both sides.
Now if you don't like that? Oh well lol. Too bad, so sad.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
trump gave an out-of-the-closet white nationalist a job as his closest adviser, the same one who headed a fake news campaign to slime his opponent. this is simple objective fact, not subject to opinion. enough of your 'both sides do it' clown show. acknowledge the simple truth instead of dancing around it like a disingenuous coward. (not that I'm expecting that at all)
He's unquestioningly a white nationalist.
I'm not sure if that's a bad thing, though. People hear the term "white supremecy" and immediately conjure images of nazi's, mass murder, jim crow era stuff, anti semetism...
All things that need to be guarded against.
But the concept of "white's dominate" in and of itself? Should that be surprising?
Does not every people want "their own" to dominate? Don't Indian's, or Muslim's, or Irish, or women.. Who doesn't want power?
Should "white nationalist's" not crave and seek power?
Originally posted by Surtur
I flat out said pieces of shit can be found on both sides. I've also said I don't condone any racism or any hate crimes done in the aftermath of Trump's win.
You don't go out of your way to condemn it either. Otherwise you'd acknowledge Ziggy for the sub-human piece of scum that he is and freely criticize Trumps appointments of white nationalists.
Originally posted by cdtm
He's unquestioningly a white nationalist.I'm not sure if that's a bad thing, though. People hear the term "white supremecy" and immediately conjure images of nazi's, mass murder, jim crow era stuff, anti semetism...
All things that need to be guarded against.
But the concept of "white's dominate" in and of itself? Should that be surprising?
Does not every people want "their own" to dominate? Don't Indian's, or Muslim's, or Irish, or women.. Who doesn't want power?
Should "white nationalist's" not crave and seek power?
Uh, no they shouldn't.
Everyone should seek equality and prosperity for all. Not push down the rest so only your group stands on top.
Seriously, the **** are you thinking? You could just as easily ask if its not right that men should crave and seek superiority over women.
Originally posted by Nephthys
You don't go out of your way to condemn it either. Otherwise you'd acknowledge Ziggy for the sub-human piece of scum that he is and freely criticize Trumps appointments of white nationalists.
I don't even know this person, nor do I know if they truly believe this or if they are just trolling like XYZ.
Plus other people have talked shit to him, does every poster here have to stop by his threads and insult this person for you?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
convenient how we can't stay on that topic.
So..was the topic of the thread the racism of this poster? Since..seems odd anyone would post a thread meant specifically for people to talk about how racist they are.
You see because if the topic isn't to discuss his racism then you're whining that people aren't talking about what you want to talk about, even though the thread isn't about the thing you want to talk about.
Originally posted by Nephthys
You don't go out of your way to condemn it either. Otherwise you'd acknowledge Ziggy for the sub-human piece of scum that he is and freely criticize Trumps appointments of white nationalists.Uh, no they shouldn't.
Everyone should seek equality and prosperity for all. Not push down the rest so only your group stands on top.
Seriously, the **** are you thinking? You could just as easily ask if its not right that men should crave and seek superiority over women.
My "group" isn't on top, though. (And I never said what "group" I belong to. 😛 )
And nobody seeks prosperity for all. NOBODY. They'll work with other groups, to a point, but everybody's belief in "equality" ends when it comes at their personal expense
Some proof? There was a lawsuit from several asian groups against Yale and Harvard. They argued affirmative action was hurting them as a group, because they exceeded a quota for asian acceptance, and many were denied entry to accomodate other races.
The self interest of this minority group is > "equality".
Stories like this kinda make me laugh:
Ellen DeGeneres forgot to bring ID to White House
Mostly because..why is this even news at all?
Plus Ellen shouldn't be shocked. You can't vote in an election without an ID, so of course you wouldn't be able to get into the White House without one.
Originally posted by cdtmAnd nobody seeks prosperity for all. NOBODY. They'll work with other groups, to a point, but everybody's belief in "equality" ends when it comes at their personal expense
Some proof? There was a lawsuit from several asian groups against Yale and Harvard. They argued affirmative action was hurting them as a group, because they exceeded a quota for asian acceptance, and many were denied entry to accomodate other races.
The self interest of this minority group is > "equality".
Whatever happend to the usual, if s/he is smart enough, let them enroll to that university. Now it's a race quota? WTF? Thanks Obama.
Originally posted by Robtard
You engaged me, Poland. So yeah, not having a good day in your crappy little country who's people actually suggested Jesus should be named "king of Poland" :0
So why are you calling this person Poland? It says that is his location, but then you don't call me "Chicago" so..?