Rune King Necro Thor vs Adult Franklin Richards

I've read it, several times.

Posting it is meaningless if you don't interpret it properly. You also take certain statements and leave everything else out, contorting the story as a whole.

Argument: Galactus said his hunger was far to great.
Counter Argument: Galactus simultaneously eating when he stated that so his hunger was decreasing.

Argument: Old King Thor stated Galactus was hungry.
Counter Argument: How would he know? He's not Galactus, and he was mocking him.

Argument: But it was described as a fetid morsel and a gutted dead remains. So he fed on the Earth. But it gave him barely anything.
Counter Argument: Galactus stated he feasted. Nuff'' said. Oh the high lighted part you're just pulling out of your ass.

Great logic.

Btw this is Old King Thor, not Odin. You clearly haven't read the comic yourself, so you clearly don't know what you're going on about.

Just shut up.

Originally posted by t0sh
I've read it, several times.

Posting it is meaningless if you don't interpret it properly. You also take certain statements and leave everything else out, contorting the story as a whole.

Argument: Galactus said his hunger was far to great.
Counter Argument: Galactus simultaneously eating when he stated that so his hunger was decreasing.

Argument: Old King Thor stated Galactus was hungry.
Counter Argument: How would he know? He's not Galactus, and he was mocking him.

Argument: But it was described as a fetid morsel and a gutted dead remains. So he fed on the Earth. [b]But it gave him barely anything.
Counter Argument: Galactus stated he feasted. Nuff'' said. Oh the high lighted part you're just pulling out of your ass.

Great logic.

Btw this is Old King Thor, not Odin. You clearly haven't read the comic yourself, so you clearly don't know what you're going on about.

Just shut up. [/B]

You're just being rude and ignorant. Not considering others opinions. I think you need a moderator to give you a lesson this.

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
You're just being rude and ignorant. Not considering others opinions. I think you need a moderator to give you a lesson this.

Yet you think I should consider your opinion?

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by t0sh
You're over looking statements and pretending you read the comic, but you obviously didn't.

Yet you think I should consider your opinion?

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

I have 8TB worth of comics stored. I've read every Marvel NOW comic. I've read probably thousands of comics. So I wouldn't go that route if I was you. So you'll have to find another insult to use.

So? Like I said above, even if you post a scan, unless you interpret it properly, posting it doesn't matter. Like-wise with owning 8TB worth of comics.

You clearly failed to interpret this one properly. Which makes you wrong.

Originally posted by t0sh
So? Like I said above, even if you post a scan, unless you interpret it properly, posting it doesn't matter. Like-wise with owning 8TB worth of comics.

You clearly failed to interpret this one properly. Which makes you wrong.

No I took the information from the comic as presented. You are the one who has decided to misinterpret it.

You changed from me not having read it at all to now having read it but not interpreting it right.

The point about the 8TB of comics wasn't to add anything. It was to tell you that your accusation that I haven't the comic is silly since what I mentioned in that message. All you'd need is to read the Thor: God of Thunder series to debate the topic me and you are discussing.

(By "you'd" I don't mean you specifically, just anyone in general)

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
No I took the information from the comic as presented. You are the one who has decided to misinterpret it.

You changed from me not having read it at all to now having read it but not interpreting it right.

The point about the 8TB of comics wasn't to add anything. It was to tell you that your accusation that I haven't the comic is silly since what I mentioned in that message. All you'd need is to read the Thor: God of Thunder series to debate the topic me and you are discussing.

(By "you'd" I don't mean you specifically, just anyone in general)

Originally posted by t0sh
You clearly haven't read it and when you posted the scans that are a part of the comic, you interpreted it incorrectly. So your opinion is constantly being shown to be misleading, ever receding arguments of ignorance.

I have read it. So why are you saying I haven't? In fact I read every Thor comic the day it came out. Since it was one of my favourite runs of a character in recent memory.

I for example know you have read the comic otherwise you wouldn't even know who "Necro Thor" is. I may disagree with you but likewise.

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
I have read it. So why are you saying I haven't? In fact I read every Thor comic the day it came out. Since it was one of my favourite runs of a character in recent memory.

I for example know you have read the comic otherwise you wouldn't even know who "Necro Thor" is. I may disagree with you but likewise.

You called Old King Thor Odin, nuff' said.

Originally posted by t0sh
* You haven't read it properly.

You called Old King Thor Odin, nuff' said.

Right so because I make one error. Which is purely a mistake by habit of association - my entire argument is wrong?

Shall I go through all of your posts and find a mistake and say therefore you're wrong about everything?

I don't see the point in doing that.

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
Right so because I make one error. Which is purely a mistake by habit of association - my entire argument is wrong?

Shall I go through all of your posts and find a mistake and say therefore you're wrong about everything?

I don't see the point in doing that.

Originally posted by t0sh
If you make an error with comprehending a basic comic, why should we consider your opinion any more factual than it was exposed not to be?

I didn't make an error with the comic. I made an error in typing.

Look what I found!

You said this.

Originally posted by t0sh
You over state things when you say something dumb like 'Galactus was at his weakest point ever' What an absurd, stupid statement.

When I actually said.

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot

The Galactus Thor fought was at one of if not the weakest points in his comic history.

So if you can't even read posts on a message board why should anyone take your opinion seriously.

The difference is with me I just corrected you because I presume you just misread it. But you on the other hand just chose to say it means I know nothing.

So if you can't even read posts on a message board why should anyone take your opinion seriously.

The difference is with me I just corrected you because I presume you just misread it. But you on the other hand just chose to say it means I know nothing.

Originally posted by t0sh
Both statements are synonymous with each other. You blew things way out of proportion, made things up to support your beliefs, while simultaneously making errors.

Your statements blew things way out of proportion, you made things up to support your beliefs, while simultaneously making errors.

It works both ways. Funny how you completely ignored the point I made.

I again am not endorsing the first line of my message since I hope that you just misread my reply to you. Carrying on this charade for no reason is pointless.

Your statements blew things way out of proportion, you made things up to support your beliefs, while simultaneously making errors.

It works both ways. Funny how you completely ignored the point I made.

I again am not endorsing the first line of my message since I hope that you just misread my reply to you. Carrying on this charade for no reason is pointless.

Originally posted by t0sh
I interpreted the statements properly, you didn't.

So you interpreted the part that said Galactus feasted - but ignored the part where it said it was a "fetid morsel". And the part where the Earth is described as "dead, gutted remains" correctly?

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
So you interpreted the part that said Galactus feasted - but ignored the part where it said it was a "fetid morsel". And the part where the Earth is described as "dead, gutted remains" correctly?

Does eating shit taste as good as eating a poutine? No. But you still ate.

💃

Confirmed, tosh is a complete moron.

Originally posted by t0sh
Galactus feasted, just because the meal didn't taste as good as he'd like doesn't disregard it.

Does eating shit taste as good as eating a poutine? No. But you still ate.

💃

Galactus doesn't get sustenance based on the size of his meal.

It's what the "meal" contains within it that makes it worthwhile to him.

If there were say 2 plain water biscuits in front of Galactus. They are both the exact same but for 2 reasons, the Large one contains 50mg of Carbohydrates and the small one contains 500mg. If Galactus had to choose between the 2 what biscuit would he eat? Taste isn't the point. It's sustenance.

If he just needed large quanitites of food to survive he could just use his ship to suck up all the asteroids that surround him to do that.

Galactus eats everything on the planet, it doesn't matter if it's life or the planet itself, he gets nourishment out of everything. Trying to differentiate between the two doesn't make sense.

http://imgur.com/a/afsr8

Here he eats the whole planet and is fed.

http://imgur.com/1090P6g

Here he only eats the life on the planet and is fed.

So his eating habits are inconsistent, but the point remains, he stated that he feasted, which is why he believed he could defeat Thor. But he couldn't. He felt that he had powered up enough to defeat him, you honestly believe that Galactus, a character between the level of Skyfathers and the cosmic beings wouldn't understand when and how much he powered up?

Nope, that logic is asinine.