New(?) Palps Quote!

Originally posted by quanchi112
What don't you get about quotes and statements that are inconsistent and contradict each other. You act like the Disney team even cares about the fanboys. They are just trying to sell the merchandise and the fact you give these the highest praise shows how low on the debating totem pole you fall.

The best part aka the icing on the cake is being the most powerful doesn't even prove they are the most formidable.

😂

Please actually examine the shit logic you try to pedal.

You're doing a really poor job of advertising for that mental hospital, aren't you?

Originally posted by SunRazer
You're doing a really poor job of advertising for that mental hospital, aren't you?

You don't have points. You're incoherently rambling about how shit the system is because you can't handle it.

The only thing that's broken is that toilet bowl you call your head.

Originally posted by SunRazer
You don't have points. You're incoherently rambling about how shit the system is because you can't handle it.

The only thing that's broken is that toilet bowl you call your head.

You obviously don't know how the system here works when it comes to determining the validity of quotes, and if you're pretending that I'm the only one who "pedals" quotes. But of course, being an unsuccessful troll who's migrated from other sub-forums, you obviously wouldn't have a clue as to the system here.

Odin's omnipotence is what you'll call hyperbole, and it occurs in SW as well. Trying to pedal "Palpatine overpowered Yoda" as hyperbole is proof that you need a plumber to fix your toilet bowl (sorry, head) leak.

If this system of using evidence to prove your point is so terrible, then just ignore it. Move on. You don't need to rail on about how terrible it is. Nobody cares about your miserable failures to produce a supported case. Go back to using emotion and ideology to prove your point as opposed to evidence.

Originally posted by SunRazer
You obviously don't know how the system here works when it comes to determining the validity of quotes, and if you're pretending that I'm the only one who "pedals" quotes. But of course, being an unsuccessful troll who's migrated from other sub-forums, you obviously wouldn't have a clue as to the system here.

Odin's omnipotence is what you'll call hyperbole, and it occurs in SW as well. Trying to pedal "Palpatine overpowered Yoda" as hyperbole is proof that you need a plumber to fix your toilet bowl (sorry, head) leak.

I'd love to get someone as retarded as you in a judged debate because I'd dominate you. I guarantee you'd never accept and posture your way right out of it though. Posters like you lack nuts.

Please don't talk about how poor other debaters are. It's blindingly obvious that your cases rely solely on emotion and ideology as opposed to actual evidence, which is why you've failed to construct a supported case in that thread and got thoroughly humiliated. And now you're throwing a temper tantrum because your emotional outlook on a case doesn't take precedence over canonical, factual information.

A judged debate? We had someone judge the debate in that last thread, and the conclusion was that you got thrashed. So you've lost that as well. You literally have nowhere to go with this. Just save what face/toilet bowl you have left and stop trying to appeal to emotions by challenging me to duels of manliness and bravado.

"Judged debates" to prove how much "nuts" you have. 😂 You're literally trying to appeal to the population now because you know you can't stand on your own two feet. And you're saying that I'm the one who's posturing? Cry some more.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Please don't talk about how poor other debaters are. It's blindingly obvious that your cases rely solely on emotion and ideology as opposed to actual evidence, which is why you've failed to construct a supported case in that thread and got thoroughly humiliated. And now you're throwing a temper tantrum because your emotional outlook on a case doesn't take precedence over canonical, factual information.

A judged debate? We had someone judge the debate in that last thread, and the conclusion was that you got thrashed. So you've lost that as well. You literally have nowhere to go with this. Just save what face/toilet bowl you have left and stop trying to appeal to emotions by challenging me to duels of manliness and bravado.

"Judged debates" to prove how much "nuts" you have. 😂 You're literally trying to appeal to the population now because you know you can't stand on your own two feet. And you're saying that I'm the one who's posturing? Cry some more.

If you're as good as you say and I'm as bad as you say then you have no leg to stand on by refusal. I wager you'll still try to posture that you're on another level while your tail goes limp and you scurry away like you always do.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Well if you believe I can't debate then let's do a judged debate. You have nothing to lose against little old me and it'll be judged. Unbiased posters we agree to you moron. Your hypocrisy and cowardice can be rather annoying especially when you can't support your stances with evidence. I didn't say I want to appeal to a popular vote but a judged debate with posters we agree on.

If you're as good as you say and I'm as bad as you say then you have no leg to stand on by refusal. I wager you'll still try to posture that you're on another level while your tail goes limp and you scurry away like you always do.

Tell me where I said that I was good. I said you appeal to emotion as opposed to facts, which you're proving to me right now by calling me out for purported hypocrisy, cowardice, telling me that I'll scurry away as always, calling me a moron, etc. Is it that hard for you to make a post without bringing such things up?

I'm not here for emotional pile-ups. When you show that you can present any semblance of objectivity and don't appeal to emotional values with every post, then I'll consider debating with you. As of yet, I'm considering proposals from far worthier candidates than you, I must say. But as I said, once your emotional stakes in all this disappear, then you'll be a valid candidate. Until then, it's a waste of my time.

Oh, and if you consider this to be proof that I'm running away in cowardice, then you're only proving my point and invalidating your worth as a debater. Of course, there's entirely the possibility that you'll spend a while trying to remain emotionally neutral so you can win me over for the debate, and then if I refuse you can call me out for cowardice again 😂

Originally posted by SunRazer
Tell me where I said you were bad or that I was good. I said you appeal to emotion as opposed to facts, which you're proving to me right now by calling me out for purported hypocrisy, cowardice, telling me that I'll scurry away as always, calling me a moron, etc. Is it that hard for you to make a post without bringing such things up?

I'm not here for emotional pile-ups. When you show that you can present any semblance of objectivity and don't appeal to emotional values with every post, then I'll consider debating with you. As of yet, I'm considering proposals from far worthier candidates than you, I must say.

Oh, and if you consider this to be proof that I'm running away in cowardice, then you're only proving my point and invalidating your worth as a debater.

As incorrectly predicted despite me poking you in the e chest you still back down. I punked you. You are weak and I won't offer you the chance for an official debate anytime soon. Live short and in peril.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Oh, and if you consider this to be proof that I'm running away in cowardice, then you're only proving my point and invalidating your worth as a debater.

👆

This is getting too easy.

Originally posted by SunRazer
👆

This is getting too easy.

And if it walks with a leaking toilet bowl on its neck, it's Quanchi. 😂

Seriously, though, as I correctly predicted, you had only emotional stakes in this, and you couldn't let go of them. You pander to perceptions of manliness and other emotions because you can't create even a semblance of a factual post. The only thing you can do is resort to trying to discredit the opposition by making them look like weak cowards because you have to compensate for that utter lack of ability to debate. You've completely destroyed your own credibility here, now and for evermore. You'll be spending the rest of your life on this forum trying to rebuild your ruined credibility and reputation.

Ant, where did you find this? Ask whoever originally posted it?

Originally posted by SunRazer
And if it walks with a leaking toilet bowl on its neck, it's Quanchi. 😂

Seriously, though, as I correctly predicted, you had only emotional stakes in this, and you couldn't let go of them. You pander to perceptions of manliness and other emotions because you can't create even a semblance of a factual post. You've completely destroyed your own credibility here, now and for evermore.

Serious question, were you always like this ? Did you ever think for yourself ?

The fact that I'm thinking for myself is how I can see through that pathetic facade of yours instead of being intimidated, lol. You're still appealing to masculinity in an attempt to conceal the abject humiliation you've just suffered.

Originally posted by SunRazer
The fact that I'm thinking for myself is how I can see through that pathetic facade of yours instead of being intimidated, lol. You're still appealing to masculinity in an attempt to conceal the abject humiliation you've just suffered.

I'm not scared - least of all by someone who's just destroyed their own credibility.

I don't need to accept because you didn't accept my terms, and secondly, you already destroyed yourself here. I don't need to do anything. You've reduced yourself to someone screaming incoherently about masculinity and cowardice endlessly without meaning. I think you've just destroyed yourself harder than I ever could've.

Originally posted by SunRazer
I'm not scared - least of all by someone who's just destroyed their own credibility.

I don't need to accept because you didn't accept my terms, and secondly, you already destroyed yourself here. I don't need to do anything. You've reduced yourself to someone screaming incoherently about masculinity and cowardice endlessly without meaning. I think you've just destroyed yourself harder than I ever could've.

The person who backed down was you, since I set out the terms for the debate and you instantly decided to reject them. I wonder why... 🙂

In any case, keep going on describing yourself. I'm out.