Originally posted by carthageHe hasn't died. He fell off a cliff. Vader was upstaged by the same Padawans in the same season.
No one asked you. Again if Maul is so great why is he the only major Sith to lose to multiple padawans.Are you and Thor both going through your menstrual cycles?
You are the one bleeding all over this thread. Maul defied the empire and the Jedi and yet his heart still beats. He's amazing and very resourceful.
🙂
Originally posted by carthage
Overconfidence doesn't mean it isn't a valid defeat, if he could've beaten him at any time prove it. Kenobi could clash multiple times with him, if Maul was so skilled he wouldve ended him out right. Instead he gloated like a retard and lost the fight. Kenobi won end of story, Maul couldn't even beat him with help in TCW. Again prove it.
It actually wasn't a totally valid Solo feat, given he got defeated once before while Maul was fighting Qui-Gon. Then he got defeated again 1 v 1, and then finally Kenobi won using "Qui-Gon's" Saber. Something that wouldn't have been available to him in a 1 on 1 fight.
So no you've proven nothing regarding Kenobi (as a Padawan or Master) being superior to Maul.
Originally posted by carthage
Prove he was amped. Show me a single source (not an actors opinion) that states Kanan was amped. Ahsoka beat Maul in the novel by trapping him, and that was before they fought in Rebels. Again another loss proving Maul blows donkeydick.
It's called common sense. Something you severely lack.
Even Rebels Ahsoka couldn't defeat Maul LMAO.
Yes ROTS Ahsoka trapped Maul with help
Keep crying that I'm breaking your Trolling rants, and trying to make you actually think about it instead.
And btw, amped or not, Kanan was a legitimate Knight as shown in Shroud of Darkness 3 episodes earlier.
So Come back when you actually know anything about Canon.
Originally posted by carthage
I never brought it up. Maul's losses to Kanan and TPM Obi wan are valid and you haven't refuted them.
You've yet to prove he's lost solo to a Padawan.
I've called you out on your BS, and now you're whining like a b**** LMAO
Originally posted by carthageLuke would effortlessly stomp Maul.
Ah so avoiding the point. Was Luke a Knight or not when he defeated Vader? Answer the question Troll.
Originally posted by carthage
Cry more like when Quan exploits your anus in every argument you flee from him.
Like I said, try actually providing a constructive argument. I get that it's hard for a Troll whose clearly in the wrong. But at least try.
Originally posted by carthage
He clashed blades with Mace for one scan, lmao and that was when he was amped by a nexus.
LOL That wasn't on Dathomir. There was no Nexus.
And no he clashed with both Secura and Mace simultaneously. And actually defeated them with the aid of 1 Deathwatch warrior.
As for the length of the fight, it was long enough for Kenobi to deflect Dooku's lightning, and Dooku to TK kill a Jedi. I'm sure you can count that's easily long enough for more than 1 blade clash. And Almost certainly longer than Kanan clashed with Maul LMAO
Originally posted by carthage
Qui gon is an old man, who was tired and winded big win for Maul lmao. And Maul lost to Ahsoka in the novel.Cry more.
Qui-Gon was Jedi Council level. Maul never lost to Ahsoka 1 v 1.
So you going to admit you're totally wrong, or you gonna carry on Trolling? Oh wait... A Troll does what a Troll has to do... Amirite?
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
How does maul fending off ahsoka for 30 seconds mean ahsoka can't beat maul?
But yea, maul wrecks padawans, he still loses to dogs though
Firstly it was for like over a minute.
Second the comparison was to his fight against Kanan who defeated him in what 10 seconds?
Third that was a pretty big dog. He was fighting off multiple bounty hunters, and still it didn't beat him. In fact they ran away from him.
So yeah, you can stop Trolling now.