Originally posted by h1a8are you for real.
Respectfully, I disagree with your logic (not necessarily your conclusion as more info is needed).This does not mean that it takes A MINIMUM of the destruction/recreation of the entire multiverse to defeat Abraxas.
Just because a nuke can destroy a human doesn't mean that anything lower can't.
What are Abraxas feats of durability? What did he resist or tank without much damage? What are his feats of power output?
It's possible that he can't permanently put Sentry down and thus force a stalemate.
Originally posted by Galan007But sentry straight up beat molecule man on panel
Also, Reed didn't *have* to use the UN to destroy/recreate the entire multiverse. He could have easily targeted a single universe/galaxy/solar system/planet/etc. if he wanted to... The fact that he wiped out the multiverse-proper, however, certainly implies that he *needed* to destroy all of creation to defeat Abraxas. Anything less simply would not have sufficed....Which makes sense, given that Abraxas was a multiversal entity -- the counterpoint of Multi-Eternity.
Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
It was a weakened Molecule Man at that. So not as impressive.
Originally posted by zopzop
Yes but it was still very impressive. That version of Molecule Man was more powerful than the version that stomped Thor/Surfer/Iron Man/Captain America and destroyed Mjolnir/Surfer's board/Cap's Shield/IM's armor.
Oh I do regard it as impressive. Just not RealityWarper impressive.
Originally posted by TethAdamTheRockAs explained in other threads: even IF Owen is operating at max power, Hickman's retcon caps him at universal. Personally, I believe he was continent-level MAX in that particular arc, given his feats AND glaring mental instability(which we know has a huge effect on his power-level at any given time.)
But sentry straight up beat molecule man on panel
But even if we entirely ignore the evidence/context of that story, and assume Owen was operating at his peak levels, Abraxas is still FAR beyond a universal power. 👆
Originally posted by h1a8you only agreed because your usual way of saying who wins was blown apart.
How did I talk nonsense? I agreed with their explanation. So agreeing with sound reasoning is talking nonsense?I almost want to report you for trolling me.
Just like you should be reported for the vast majority of your posts 👆
Originally posted by Insane Titan
you only agreed because your usual way of saying who wins was blown apart.Just like you should be reported for the vast majority of your posts 👆
I never claimed who wins as I honestly didn't know. No where did you see me say anyone wins. If you actually read my posts then you would see this clearly. I was pointing out the flaw in Galans reasoning, until he gave more details to it.
Here's my post:
Originally posted by h1a8
Respectfully, I disagree with your logic (not necessarily your conclusion as more info is needed).This does not mean that it takes A MINIMUM of the destruction/recreation of the entire multiverse to defeat Abraxas.
Just because a nuke can destroy a human doesn't mean that anything lower can't.
What are Abraxas feats of durability? What did he resist or tank without much damage? What are his feats of power output?
It's possible that he can't permanently put Sentry down and thus force a stalemate.
I was basically asking questions as well. Not making claims. I even said that I didn't disagree with his conclusion (at the very beginning) but just his reasoning without MORE INFO.
Do this again and I'm reporting you for trolling and flaming.
Originally posted by h1a8your post on the first page said Sentry stomps , just stop lying.
I never claimed who wins as I honestly didn't know. No where did you see me say anyone wins. If you actually read my posts then you would see this clearly. I was pointing out the flaw in Galans reasoning, until he gave more details to it.Here's my post:
I was basically asking questions as well. Not making claims. I even said that I didn't disagree with his conclusion (at the very beginning) but just his reasoning without MORE INFO.
Do this again and I'm reporting you for trolling and flaming.
Like I said ever post on every topic of yours should be reported for trolling and ignorance.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
your post on the first page said Sentry stomps , just stop lying.Like I said ever post on every topic of yours should be reported for trolling and ignorance.
Yes I did. What's wrong with saying someone stomps if you think they do? We are not allowed our opinions? When solid evidence was presented I agreed to it and changed my stance. No where did I troll or break forum rules on this thread.
I never troll. I never ignore evidence, I address it (whether I agree with it or not) and I always provide evidence or reasoning for my stance. Trolling is ignoring evidence, Flaming, personal attacks, and spamming or derailing the thread with irrelevant stuff.
If I troll on every topic then it should be easy to find at least 2 times I trolled. Post at least 2 times I trolled in the last 5 threads in the comic vs. Forum.
Originally posted by h1a8you just that you never said who wins and know you're admitting you're admitting you said who wins. WTF, do you even read your own post?
Yes I did. What's wrong with saying someone stomps if you think they do? We are not allowed our opinions? When solid evidence was presented I agreed to it and changed my stance. No where did I troll or break forum rules on this thread.I never troll. I never ignore evidence, I address it (whether I agree with it or not) and I always provide evidence or reasoning for my stance. Trolling is ignoring evidence, Flaming, personal attacks, and spamming or derailing the thread with irrelevant stuff.
If I troll on every topic then it should be easy to find at least 2 times I trolled. Post at least 2 times I trolled in the last 5 threads in the comic vs. Forum.
😆 to the whole second part of your post, barefaced lies.