Blade Runner 2049

And so did the previous movie before it tanked, Dumbshit112

You take everything to heart and are rather naive, Kaz.

nothing wrong with talking about it, idiot.

Originally posted by Kazenji
And so did the previous movie before it tanked, Dumbshit112

nothing wrong with talking about it, idiot.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Ridley scott has an idea for a 3rd movie and might also direct it too

https://screenrant.com/blade-runner-3-ridley-scott-idea/

i'd say nope to the directing part, After how the recent alien movie was handled.

I wouldn't let him near it. I'd let Villeneuve take a crack at it again, but only if they get a new writer onboard. Someone who can write a less slow plot.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

He really enhanced your movie experience.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I wouldn't let him near it. I'd let Villeneuve take a crack at it again, but only if they get a new writer onboard. Someone who can write a less slow plot.

I tend to agree. The opening with Dave Bautista was really cool and then I actually sort of felt like it was all down hill from there. I had trouble caring because it was soooooo slow moving. Although the cinematography was phenomenal all the way through.

saw this last night and liked it. i knew this would be a slow movie and i wasn't expecting a thrill ride. it was really slow but the cinematography was beautiful, bought it on blu ray

i still liked ghost in the shell better though

Dave Bautista was great, much better actor than the rock

Originally posted by -Pr-
I wouldn't let him near it. I'd let Villeneuve take a crack at it again, but only if they get a new writer onboard. Someone who can write a less slow plot.

agreed 👆

Originally posted by The Nuul

i still liked ghost in the shell better though

Same.

Originally posted by The Nuul

Dave Bautista was great, much better actor than the rock

Oh, without a doubt.

Originally posted by The Nuul
Dave Bautista was great, much better actor than the rock

Yeah, he is great, which is why it was a shame he was underused. That was probably my favorite part of the movie.

Originally posted by quanchi112
And how many years did it take to get the sequel. Therein lies the answer. Ridley Scott has diarrhea of the mouth. You are free to get worked up over this dolts ramblings but unlike you I'm capable of learning from past experiences.

Jesus! Shut up!

Originally posted by SquallX
Jesus! Shut up!

Originally posted by SquallX
Jesus! Shut up!

Agreed

Quan needs to know when to shut up at times.

I never finished this movie.

Garbage.

Originally posted by The Nuul
Dave Bautista was great, much better actor than the rock

Yeah, Dave has shown that he can actually deliver a pretty solid performance if given the right part. Sadly, because of his appearance, he tends to get typecast as some kind of big brute/thug a lot (which is very apparent if you look at his filmography).

Cost 150mil to make; only brought in around 260mil. So sadly, doubt we'll have another film, at least anytime soon.

This movie was ridiculously slooooow. And long. Phuck.

Sure it has its flaws, but it was a solid sci-fi as a whole. Story, acting, cinematography, protein farming, directing etc

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
This movie was ridiculously slooooow. And long. Phuck.

Yeah, and I'm usually okay with that, especially when the cinematography and visuals are soooo good, but the characters were so distant and un-relatable that I couldn't really get into it.

And it didn't feel like there was ever really a decent pay-off.

That being said, I do plan to watch it again and give it another chance.

This was the best movie of 2017.

You are insane.

Originally posted by Nephthys
This was the best movie of 2017.