Originally posted by Emperordmb
So hold on a second... you actually take the Kanan Maul thing as a serious indication of how they'd fare against each other in a legit fight?
No I said that his loss to Kanan stands out as out of place as a gay guy at a Chick Fil A.
Cause Maul fought fairly evenly against Ahsoka who held her own pretty solidly against Vader, then Kanan, Ahsoka's obvious vast inferior, beats Maul extremely quickly and throws him off a cliff..
Where am I denying that this wasn't the case at all?
[b]It should be extremely obvious that that incident was bullshit and not an accurate gauge on how Maul and Kanan stack up.
Yeah. What I said was that it appears laughable because of the very rough estimates of power of the enemies of Kanan make them out to be very vague at best and thus Kanan beating Maul leaves us scratching our heads thinking "wait what how?"
So because we know so little of the Inquisitors besides what we've seen for the last season the forums have seen Maul take a nosedive in the overrall placement on combative listings. I was merely explaining why people see Maul as a laughing stock. Never did I say I personally believe that any of it is true.