Will Trump have a mental breakdown in office?

Originally posted by BackFire
I think he could have a mental breakdown. I've heard that he doesn't get a lot of sleep which isn't going to do any favors for his already strained mental capacity. Plus urine doesn't have the necessary vitamins and minerals that the mind needs to operate and peak capacity, so that might be a problem since that seems to be his drink of choice.

I think he's likely to get himself impeached before any mental breakdown occurs.

Yeah, but I doubt most presidents got much sleep.

Originally posted by BackFire
I think he could have a mental breakdown. I've heard that he doesn't get a lot of sleep which isn't going to do any favors for his already strained mental capacity. Plus urine doesn't have the necessary vitamins and minerals that the mind needs to operate and peak capacity, so that might be a problem since that seems to be his drink of choice.

I think he's likely to get himself impeached before any mental breakdown occurs.

Is the claim that he's a piss-drinker or that he enjoys being pissed on by underage Ruskie prostitutes?

Originally posted by Robtard
Is the claim that he's a piss-drinker or that he enjoys being pissed on by underage Ruskie prostitutes?

Doesn't really matter. Both are out there now, thus, both are true.

He needs to get out in front of this and specifically deny it.

Originally posted by Robtard
He needs to get out in front of this and specifically deny it.

Hmm? Why? Are you saying the lack of a specific denial of something lends credibility to that something?

Originally posted by Surtur
Hmm? Why? Are you saying the lack of a specific denial of something lends credibility to that something?

I'm using your logic. eg where Clinton not coming and denying that Podesta has blood orgies where people eat semen cakes means the story is true. Let me guess, we can't use that same standard because Trump.

Look, I’m not saying that I believe that Donald Trump was urinated on by two underage Russian prostitutes, I’m not saying that. But really you can’t help but wonder. I mean, there are a lot of really smart people saying that Donald Trump hired two underage Russian prostitutes to urinate on him, but could it really be true? I don’t know. I’m not saying it’s true, but why hasn’t he come out and denied that he paid two underage Russian prostitutes to urinate on him. It does seem suspicious. But I’m not saying he had two Russian children pee on him. I’m just asking questions.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm using your logic. eg where Clinton not coming and denying that Podesta has blood orgies where people eat semen cakes means the story is true. Let me guess, we can't use that same standard because Trump.

You misunderstand me. Use it, I just wanted to make sure you're approving it's use.

By all means, apply it.

Originally posted by BackFire
Look, I’m not saying that I believe that Donald Trump was urinated on by two underage Russian prostitutes, I’m not saying that. But really you can’t help but wonder. I mean, there are a lot of really smart people saying that Donald Trump hired two underage Russian prostitutes to urinate on him, but could it really be true? I don’t know. I’m not saying it’s true, but why hasn’t he come out and denied that he paid two underage Russian prostitutes to urinate on him. It does seem suspicious. But I’m not saying he had two Russian children pee on him. I’m just asking questions.

A lot of really smart people said Hilary would be our next president. Sucks, right? For them, I mean. Being so majorly wrong probably is a blow to the ego(a lot of intelligent people, for some reason, are arrogant).

Originally posted by Surtur
You misunderstand me. Use it, I just wanted to make sure you're approving it's use.

By all means, apply it.

So why aren't you condemning Trump for this? Since it's apparently true using your standards.

I dunno, I'm just not sure what to think. I'm not saying he likes to drink urine and donates large sums of money to NAMBLA. I'm not saying that. I'm just asking questions, questions that deserve answers. Why are so many people saying that he likes to drink children's pee and give so much money to NAMBLA? It's just strange is all, why so many people are saying he gets peed on all the time.

Originally posted by Surtur
A lot of really smart people said Hilary would be our next president. Sucks, right? For them, I mean. Being so majorly wrong probably is a blow to the ego(a lot of intelligent people, for some reason, are arrogant).

Originally posted by Robtard
So why aren't you condemning Trump for this? Since it's apparently true using your standards.

But he said the reports weren't true, did he not?

Was there more than one report? I heard of a 35 page report. He specifically addressed the report and said it is nonsense. Hilary never specifically said wikileaks in general(or even a specific email) were nonsense.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You also said trump didn't have a chance, dummy.

But this doesn't change the fact a lot of smart people were hilariously wrong.

Originally posted by Surtur
But this doesn't change the fact a lot of smart people were hilariously wrong.

Originally posted by BackFire
I dunno, I'm just not sure what to think. I'm not saying he likes to drink urine and donates large sums of money to NAMBLA. I'm not saying that. I'm just asking questions, questions that deserve answers. Why are so many people saying that he likes to drink children's pee and give so much money to NAMBLA? It's just strange is all, why so many people are saying he gets peed on all the time.

It's butthurt over losing the election. Losing sucks, amirite? It's almost like they lost several times. The election. The attempt to get electors not to vote for Trump. The attempt to object when congress counted the votes.

So many losses? It's gotta hurt and it's gotta cloud a lot of peoples minds.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You aren't smart and you were also wrong. Smarter people are still up on your dumb ass.

You seem to be under the impression I claimed to be some very smart person or anything of the sort? I simply responded to the logic of "a lot of smart people think" being used, that is all.

Originally posted by Surtur
You seem to be under the impression I claimed to be some very smart person or anything of the sort? I simply responded to the logic of "a lot of smart people think" being used, that is all.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's butthurt over losing the election. Losing sucks, amirite? It's almost like they lost several times. The election. The attempt to get electors not to vote for Trump. The attempt to object when congress counted the votes.

So many losses? It's gotta hurt and it's gotta cloud a lot of peoples minds.

You may be right. But so many people are saying that he likes to get urinated on. So many great and smart people are saying it. Maybe there's some truth to it. These are great people, ok? Really great people saying that he hired Russian teenage prostitutes to urinate on him. I just don't know what to believe.

Originally posted by Surtur
But he said the reports weren't true, did he not?

Was there more than one report? I heard of a 35 page report. He specifically addressed the report and said it is nonsense. Hilary never specifically said wikileaks in general(or even a specific email) were nonsense.

Not sure, did he specifically say that he's never paid underage prostitutes to urinate on him? Cos the reports made multiple claims, yeah? If so, please post the source.

Personally, I don't believe it, but I have standards of proof I adhere to.