Originally posted by NewGuy01
Sounds like something he might have said, but I don't remember anything like that in particular.I believe he did say that the authority of works in the same canon level are determined by what's more recent, number of aligning sources, etc. though, so statements can be disputed by other statements.
That was him explaining the way he sorted out disputed retcons, IIRC. One of the criteria was "which is the coolest explanation?", so if that applied to fans, it'd basically mean that you can accept things arbitrarily.