Apparent terrorist attack on a Canadian mosque

Started by Bashar Teg5 pages

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Christ.

And yeah pretty gross behavior from Surtur, but hardly unexpected. 😬

expected behavior would be for him to avoid the news that his assertions were dead wrong, like a coward (see above). however i never suspected that he was capable of this level of deplorable behavior.

Originally posted by Surtur
What I enjoy is how easily they chastise someone for being a bad person and in the same breath wish some kind of horrible fate upon them lol. They can't even virtue signal properly anymore.

To a Leftist Progressive the only good Virtue is a Stolen Virtue.

aka they all about the raping.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
expected behavior would be for him to avoid the news that his assertions were dead wrong, like a coward (see above).

But I admitted I was wrong lol.

however i never suspected that he was capable of this level of deplorable behavior.

Lol you're so triggered. All I did was posting a laughing smiley at a comment someone else made.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]To a Leftist Progressive the only good Virtue is a Stolen Virtue.

aka they all about the raping. [/B]

They are more triggered at my reaction to the mocking than by the person who mocked lol.

Now they'll just turn this into a back and forth about how vile they think I am. That will dominant the rest of the topic about a tragedy they supposedly care about so much. It's why I can't take their pearl clutching seriously.

Surtur's getting worse and worse. It's almost like he's being emboldened by his leader to be a bigger POS each passing day. Anyhow.

Turns out Alexandre Bissonnette was a Right-Wing pro-Trump sort of guy, according to people who knew him. Surely there can't be any connection.

Really unfortunate that they released the name of the suspect turned witness like they did, guy probably is in danger because a lot of people probably haven't/won't hear that he's not a suspect anymore, but was actually a witness.

Also pathetic to see people using this tragedy to try and further their political agenda, even before the facts were in.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I guess there is like a 0.1% chance it was. 99.9% chance it was just good ol' fashioned Islamic violence.

Oh my goodness, it looks like this might actually be one of those 0.1% cases.

i hope bada continues to clean up this piece of shit GDF 👆

it needs a major clean up.

Originally posted by The Nuul
i hope bada continues to clean up this piece of shit GDF 👆

it needs a major clean up.


So many people got bann0red.

Originally posted by Robtard
Surtur's getting worse and worse. It's almost like he's being emboldened by his leader to be a bigger POS each passing day. Anyhow.

Vous êtes l'instigateur

Originally posted by Robtard
Turns out Alexandre Bissonnette was a Right-Wing pro-Trump sort of guy, according to people who knew him. Surely there can't be any connection.

A vrai dire peu de paroles.

Votre Connexion

Originally posted by Robtard
Turns out Alexandre Bissonnette was a Right-Wing pro-Trump sort of guy, according to people who knew him. Surely there can't be any connection.

Exactly! Since the vast majority of Trump supporters aren't violent towards muslims, it must be an ideology of peace. 🙂

aaaaand trump's press secretary used the shootings as justification for their anti-muslim fear-mongering policies. 👆

"it's a terrible reminder of why we must remain vigilant and why the president is taking steps to be proactive rather than reactive when it comes to our nation's safety and security."

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/donald-trumps-press-secretary-used-the-quebec-mosque-attack-to-justify-the-muslim-ban?utm_source=vicefbca&utm_campaign=Global

i'm sure we've reached the heart of the issue, and he's just trying to protect muslims. if they're not allowed to enter the country, surely they cannot be murdered on american soil.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
aaaaand trump's press secretary used the shootings as justification for their anti-muslim fear-mongering policies. 👆

"it's a terrible reminder of why we must remain vigilant and why the president is taking steps to be proactive rather than reactive when it comes to our nation's safety and security."

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/donald-trumps-press-secretary-used-the-quebec-mosque-attack-to-justify-the-muslim-ban?utm_source=vicefbca&utm_campaign=Global

i'm sure we've reached the heart of the issue, and he's just trying to protect muslims. if they're not allowed to enter the country, surely they cannot be murdered on american soil.

And Obama used every Cops shooting as a way to divide the Country. Same shit. The only difference, is you're fake out rage.

Originally posted by SquallX
i have nothing to contribute to the discussion besides trolling. please put me on ignore

no problem, sir

Interesting how people see a connection between Trump supporters and violence and yet don't see any connection between radical Islam and violence.

Neither does Trump, considering he refuses to cut ties with Saudi Arabia, which is the main funder of Wahabbi radical Islamism. That's the thing about the Muslim ban. The countries not included in it are the only ones whose citizens have attacked US soil, and are the only ones in which Trump has business ties. That's why Trump and his Islamophobic supporters are hypocrites. They claim to fear Muslims, yet have no problem having relations with the main funders of radical Islamic terrorism, thus creating the Islamic terrorism they fear so much.

Same hypocritical way that they ally with white supremacists like Steve Bannon, yet wonder why there is white supremacist violence.

Originally posted by SquallX
And Obama used every Cops shooting as a way to divide the Country. Same shit. The only difference, is you're fake out rage.

Yes, Obama, in his attempts to pander to the libtards, actually made some of those situations with his comments.

He should have been preaching words of solidarity and community healing instead of vague insinuations of people vs. the authority or blacks vs. whites.

That was poor judgement on his part. Shitty judgement.

But he got to speak a little bit of his mind, at least. Cannot fault him for taking a very vague side in these things...he did the best he could in a sea of overly sensitive knee jerk, hyper-politically-correct-media-d*ck-sucking, whiners.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Neither does Trump, considering he refuses to cut ties with Saudi Arabia, which is the main funder of Wahabbi radical Islamism. That's the thing about the Muslim ban. The countries not included in it are the only ones whose citizens have attacked US soil, and are the only ones in which Trump has business ties. That's why Trump and his Islamophobic supporters are hypocrites. They claim to fear Muslims, yet have no problem having relations with the main funders of radical Islamic terrorism, thus creating the Islamic terrorism they fear so much.

I will say that his Islamaphobic supporters are not hypocrites as you state. Just the opposite. They want the bans to extend to most of those 30-other majority Muslim countries, too. They do not think Trump went far enough. They are not on the band wagon of thinking Trump's actions were perfect or even complete.

To make my point even more clear, they do have a problem with continued friendly relations with countries like Saudi Arabia.

You can trust me on this...I have a sample size of hundreds of Oklahoman Islamaphobic people from which to derive this data.

I will say that they (my Islamaphobic acquaintances) do not wish to ban immigration from Indonesia. For some reason, they don't care about Asian Muslims as much as they do Arab Muslims. 😉

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Exactly! Since the vast majority of Trump supporters aren't violent towards muslims, it must be an ideology of peace. 🙂

Apply that same logic to the 1.6 billion Muslims of the world who are not violent 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Apply that same logic to the 1.6 billion Muslims of the world who are not violent 🙂

pretty sure that was the jest