Mace Windu Runs The Revan Gauntlet

4-6.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
The quote is suggestingstating it was accurate as of the 2002 to 2005 time-span.

That's further solidified by the third paragraph saying the re-release doesn't apply to future characters.

I'll send a response message for clarification though, since you're too brain dead to understand.

The later paragraphs seem to confirm that it only refers to characters prexisting in continuity, but that is not the same as what you attempted to claim.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
The later paragraphs seem to confirm that it only refers to characters prexisting in continuity

Oh sry, I forgot that your cognitive functions fail to operate when discussing something that does not revolve around your beloved senpai. 🙁

I'd like to see the full response, Ant. ./:

On the last page.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66

The rest was De Agostini not understanding (there's a shocker) what I was asking (if it was Legends canon) and they thought I was asking if the quote from the Fact Files was also Disney Canon, in which they then clarified how the re-release operates under the new Canon policy.

The part regarding the discussion here is the snippet I originally posted.

It is a dark day indeed when Kbro of all people makes the most lucid point.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66

So that basically means one thing: if a Fact File statement is contradicted by later sources then those later sources take precedence. If it's not contradicted, I see no reason to assume they don't hold any weight.

Refer to my original question:

"Quotes regarding most powerful Jedi only applied to the old Star Wars continuity during the time-span of the publication?"

There response was "this is correct..." Thus, "any official information" is referring to content in general, not direct retcons.

Can't argue with that.

As for general legends canon would this mean legends quotes don't hold any bearing on new characters? Or would that only be if there are official quotes afterwards which contradict the quote in question

My question specifically asked regarding new characters simply existing, not direct retcons, so I'd say the former.

The latter is also true, but that has always been policy.

🍺

Originally posted by MythLord
So that basically means one thing: if a Fact File statement is contradicted by later sources then those later sources take precedence. If it's not contradicted, I see no reason to assume they don't hold any weight.

To be entirely fair, this only applies to DeAgostini. Other publishers might have different policies, but I honestly doubt it.

This should be common sense anyways that any statements only pertain to existing characters at the time.

Originally posted by quanchi112
This should be common sense anyways that any statements only pertain to existing characters at the time.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you're unbelievably stupid and cannot grasp the meaning of this post. I guanantee someone dropped you as a child. Multiple times.

I know basic comprehension is outside your general capabilities, but you could try and look at things logically. Continuity doesn't work by just dismissing every quote that's made before a certain source came out.

It holds some weight unless completely contradicted.

Well ant about the conception of characters afterwards, not sources