General Grievous (ROTS) vs Inquisitors (Rebels)

Started by Kurk2 pages

legends stomps ; canon loses

meat-head inquisitor gets pwned; the others are smart enough/defensive enough to out-last him like Kenobi as a team.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
What have Assoka surviving a few seconds against GG, and her now being a match for Vader have to do with anything lmao.

ahsoka did more than "survive a few seconds" in their season 5 fight, And while i understand that canon grevious is supposed to be weaker than legends grevious, given that canon grevious has outdueled kenobi, dented starfighters, walked through mother talzin's shield, fought evenly with maul ect. the difference is overblown

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
ahsoka did more than "survive a few seconds" in their season 5 fight, And while i understand that canon grevious is supposed to be weaker than legends grevious, given that canon grevious has outdueled kenobi, dented starfighters, walked through mother talzin's shield, fought evenly with maul ect. the difference is overblown

There is a significant difference though really.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
There is a significant difference though really.

as there is with literally any tcw dude. Anakin/kenobi in tcw struggle with rocks when in legends they can guide/cloak/hold together 40 m ships and manipulate dreadnaughts that dwarf cruisers. That doesn't serve as a reason to diminish someone's showing vs them.