Originally posted by ares834Even barring FPJ's explanation it's pretty obvious from the visual and auditory cues that Kanan was at peak performance and likely in a state of oneness or something similar, plus the fact Maul was evidently extremely overconfident, but I don't see why we should disregard FPJ's statements on Maul vs Kanan regardless.
A canon explanation? Or just some nonsense from voice actors?
Embarassed by a half trained Jedi and blitzed by Uncle Ben.
Sad.
http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/battles-7/maul-vs-kenobi-round-7-1851230/?page=3
Marco/Erkan is having a mental breakdown
Originally posted by carthage
Kenobi very clearly has as of ANH surpassed Maul in light saber skill, was Vaders only threat as a combatant in the time period, and was surpassed only by Luke who he trained. The whole fight makes me reinterpret the duel in ANH, it's very clear that he stonewalled Vader and was a peer. He very well could've lost only to stamina, but yeah Ben ****ing destroyed h
Kenobi had surpassed maul as a duelist as of tcw.....
And yea kenobi/Vader can blitz dooku tiers now
Originally posted by SunRazer
Not sure if the developers actually adhere to a rigid structure to begin with. Apart from essentials like Vader and Palpatine being at the top, it's disturbingly inconsistent. I suppose in Canon Jedi and Sith are privy to random amps for varying reasons.