Morpheus reportedly being eyed as the center of the new movie
http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/new-matrix-movie-reportedly-could-center-on-morpheus-247
Kaz is right, quanch. No one takes you seriously. If you provided a link you might gain some credibility.
Hm... I think I'd rather see a continuation, not a prequel unless of course they go back to the very beginning with the overthrow of humanity and throwing them into the pods. I'd like to see more stuff take place in the real world and in the Machine City. That's cool pulpy sci-fi shit.
Originally posted by Patient_LeechOh no we don't need more real world stuff we need more matrix. That's what went wrong with the final film. Too much real world stuff. Throw some in there but the bulk should be placed in the Matrix world. That's what made these films special and unique.
Kaz is right, quanch. No one takes you seriously. If you provided a link you might gain some credibility.Hm... I think I'd rather see a continuation, not a prequel unless of course they go back to the very beginning with the overthrow of humanity and throwing them into the pods. I'd like to see more stuff take place in the real world and in the Machine City. That's cool pulpy sci-fi shit.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That's what went wrong with the final film. Too much real world stuff.
Nope. That shit's cool. Dirty, grungy stuff. Hell, even in The Matrix (1999) a lot of the matrix action was still kind of dirty and grungy, a lot of the fights. The sequels looked a little too squeaky clean and neat.
Originally posted by Patient_LeechWell your opinion of what you wAnt seems to be apparently all the same. Boring. Sci Fi and dark. You love the Riddick universe when it's overall very weak compared to other great Sci Fi films. You are a one trick pony and guess what I don't care if you think I'm lying or not. You're just some loser on the Internet.
Nope. That shit's cool. Dirty, grungy stuff. Hell, even in The Matrix (1999) a lot of the matrix action was still kind of dirty and grungy, a lot of the fights. The sequels looked a little too squeaky clean and neat.
Originally posted by Patient_LeechSays the guy who has done nothing on this site. You have no impact. You're just some guy who loves dark Sci Fi. I am well known and actually have an impact on the entire forum. You're an extra on the set of a major film whereas I am the big bad.
Please, quanchi. No one takes you seriously.Don't get me wrong, I actually am a big defender of the sequels, but I'm just pointing out how they did separate themselves quite a bit from the first film.
Point is what made the matrix films interesting is their virtual world not the real world outside of it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Says the guy who has done nothing on this site. You have no impact. You're just some guy who loves dark Sci Fi. I am well known and actually have an impact on the entire forum. You're an extra on the set of a major film whereas I am the big bad.
😂 You're a delusional megalomaniac, quanch. Nothing more.
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Well goddamn, I guess it was only a matter of time, but it still seems rather soon to me..They are indeed in the early stages of remaking The Matrix...
So does this mean they are going to reboot it and make the same sequels that the Wachowskis made or make it in such a way that it will go on for more than just three films...? oh, lord. I'm pretty sure I disapprove of this idea. I think it's kind of a pathetic and desperate attempt by WB to make money. But I fear it will backfire on them because it's probably not going to have the same innovative impact that it had back in 1999. The Matrix Trilogy is actually a quite impressive work of art and I don't think it can really be recaptured.
Agree with about everything here, but if WB is bound and determined to make more Matrices, make them sequels and not reboots.