Highfather Vs King Thor

Started by Sin I AM2 pages

Originally posted by carver9
He had his Uru arm as shown here.

This version of Thor stomps. Galactus punched him with the force of a billion super novas which sent Thor from one end of the planet to the other. He kept going and the force of the punch destroyed the moon. He tanked it.

Even though this is a different timeline, isn't this the same exact Thor that fought Gorr?

Scan zaddy

Is teth colossus big c?

^ Yep

Originally posted by carver9
Collateral damage isn't an indicator of power output. It just isn't. A lot of high showings can be dismissed because of this.

Normally I would agree, but a billion supernovas vs. moon damage? Please, it's evidence of extreme hyperbole.

It also just says that his fists match the force of his rage which is "like a billion supernovas"... the speech style and use of 'like' make this more of a poetic comparison than an exact measurement. So, probably hyperbole.

Originally posted by Cogito
^ Yep

Normally I would agree, but a billion supernovas vs. moon damage? Please, it's evidence of extreme hyperbole.

Um
He didn't Punch the moon,he punched odin with that power

Odin went through the earth and crashed into the moon which destroyed it.

Highfather probably wins. He was a peer to Darkseid.

Originally posted by Genii96
Um
He didn't Punch the moon,he punched odin with that power

Odin went through the earth and crashed into the moon which destroyed it.

Thor, not Odin, but that's not important.

It's collateral damage - conservation of energy. Carter is right, we don't usually place much stock in it as a power gauge, but ridiculous numbers like a billion supernovas don't usually get thrown around so it's an unusual case.

A supernova can put out as much energy in one instant as our entire sun will during its entire lifetime combined. Multiply that by a billion. And then think about the moon. And then think about how it's Thor, who's naturally hyperbolic, making the statement.

Originally posted by carver9
Collateral damage isn't an indicator of power output. It just isn't. A lot of high showings can be dismissed because of this.
It is. Lack of collateral damage is not an indication of power output (sometimes).

Originally posted by carver9
Narrator said it so I'm sure it wasn't hyperbole. We can't dismiss one statement while accepting others. Picking and choosing.
Originally posted by carver9
Collateral damage isn't an indicator of power output. It just isn't. A lot of high showings can be dismissed because of this.

😆 Carter just couldn't help but blatantly contradict himself.