Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Not canonically, just in legend from the Killiks, who weren't even present at the battle.
Killiks have a rich history with said Celestial beings, and were given knowledge and stories from those beings themselves. I'd put more weight on their words than yours, tbh.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
All of which are based around the TCW era, I believe.
The former is all-encompasing, IIRC.
https://e16i.imgup.net/revand7f1.png
Emphasis on second paragraph.
This article is officially a Legends canon work. C-Canon in fact, so on par with the RotS novelization in terms of its legitimacy.
The quote specifically lists "the most powerful," not "some" or "among."
It's far more direct than the quotes you write off with Kun > Vitiate, at the very least.
Thus, Palpatine, Revan, and Caedus are canonically the three most powerful Sith as of 2008.
Vitiate and Plagueis are exempt due to later quotes putting them above Revan, but the other Sith aren't.
Since I can actually think, I have SoR Revan on par with Kun, but if we're using pure quotes, Darth Revan > Tenebrous.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
https://e16i.imgup.net/revand7f1.pngEmphasis on second paragraph.
This article is officially a Legends canon work. C-Canon in fact, so on par with the RotS novelization in terms of its legitimacy.
The quote specifically lists "the most powerful," not "some" or "among."
It's far more direct than the quotes you write off with Kun > Vitiate, at the very least.
Thus, Palpatine, Revan, and Caedus are canonically the three most powerful Sith as of 2008.
Vitiate and Plagueis are exempt due to later quotes putting them above Revan, but the other Sith aren't.
Since I can actually think, I have SoR Revan on par with Kun, but if we're using pure quotes, Darth Revan > Tenebrous.
Well, can you prove miniature game quotes are part of the actual Legends continuity, and not just part of the game's own? I recall the Bastila/Dooku/Kenobi one being solely for the game.
Also, since you said "I can actually think" then I assume you have some legitmate reason to dismiss the quote.
Also, it's not purely about quotes. Feats matter too. If a character A is deemed to be stronger via a quote than character B, but has clearly established limits via feats i.e. at max can only lift 10 tons, and if character B clearly has no such limit (has performed better feats) then the quote blatantly contradicts the source material and is rendered void.