DC's God Team runs the Marvel Gauntlet...

The DC roster will consist of...

-The New-New Gods-

+

-DCnU Darkseid-

+

-DCnU Anti-Monitor-

+

-Mazahs Jr.-

VS.

**The Marvel Gauntlet**

Round 0 (warm-up): Odin
Round 1: Galactus after feeding on 4 worlds
Round 2: 4 Mad Celestials
Round 3: Merged/Voltron Celestial
Round 4: Galactus Engine
Round 5: Black Panther /w/ IG
Round 6: God Emperor Doom
Round 7: Current Owen Reece

*Fights take place on Apokolips.
*Assume the DC Team works together harmoniously, and have their powers fully restored after every Round.
*This is a standard gauntlet, NOT a stacking/growing gauntlet.

How far do they get?

i think this team stops at 5. i just cant see them beating god doom considering he has the powers of the beyonders who are > tribunal > ig

but on the other hand....... he cant even fix his face lmao. and bp with gauntlet, who is universal gave him a hell of a fight.....

yeah i think the team stops at owen, ****er put an omniverse in a box

It's tricky to judge this due to anti-life equation.

I'd say 6, if we assume Molecule Man allowed Doom access to the full power.

Can't see them beating the Galactus engine.

If the team gets past 5, they should stop at 6.

The ALE, Death, and Hal make it a breeze to get to 5 though. Flash alone should shitstomp the GE despite Carter's opinion otherwise.

Originally posted by ghostman
i think this team stops at 5. i just cant see them beating god doom considering he has the powers of the beyonders who are > tribunal > ig

but on the other hand....... he cant even fix his face lmao. and bp with gauntlet, who is universal gave him a hell of a fight.....

yeah i think the team stops at owen, ****er put an omniverse in a box

Doom stomped Black Panther with the IG.

Originally posted by carver9
Doom stomped Black Panther with the IG.

nope.

Originally posted by ghostman
nope.

This is a stomp. If you consider this a fight, I don't know what to tell you.

The Phoenix force did better.

They stop at 6.

Originally posted by carver9
The Phoenix force did better.

Here is the full battle between God Emperor Doom and T'Challa /w/ IG:
http://i.imgur.com/5dMvDlP.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/R7XX6mg.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/yCcfBC7.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/wvR2bOV.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/mndeb2N.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/N5wiDWf.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/AzCFYBG.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/qkV3YOI.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/PaMfkDJ.jpg

And here is God Emperor Doom vs. Phoenix:

4 or 5

Originally posted by Galan007
Lol. You must not have read the entire battle between Panther and Doom(you didn't post the whole fight, btw), if you think Phoenix did better.

Here is the full battle between God Emperor Doom and T'Challa /w/ IG:
http://i.imgur.com/5dMvDlP.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/R7XX6mg.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/yCcfBC7.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/wvR2bOV.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/mndeb2N.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/N5wiDWf.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/AzCFYBG.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/qkV3YOI.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/PaMfkDJ.jpg

And here is God Emperor Doom vs. Phoenix:

Originally posted by ghostman
i think this team stops at 5. i just cant see them beating god doom considering he has the powers of the beyonders who are > tribunal > ig

but on the other hand....... he cant even fix his face lmao. and bp with gauntlet, who is universal gave him a hell of a fight.....

yeah i think the team stops at owen, ****er put an omniverse in a box

It's a completely ridiculous feat to be sure, but ive been meaning to know the exact intention behind owen's omniversal feat. As in, what is Ewing's definition of the omniverse?

On panel he seems to be using the terms multiverse and omniverse interchangeably, but i came across an interview where he specifically differentiated between the two and stated that the omniverse is the collection of all the multiverses, superflow, and everything else marvel has shown. So im not really sure what to make of this.

Originally posted by operator616
It's a completely ridiculous feat to be sure, but ive been meaning to know the exact intention behind owen's omniversal feat. As in, what is Ewing's definition of the omniverse?

On panel he seems to be using the terms multiverse and omniverse interchangeably, but i came across an interview where he specifically differentiated between the two and stated that the omniverse is the collection of all the multiverses, superflow, and everything else marvel has shown. So im not really sure what to make of this.

The most blatant example that comes to mind is when the chained Eternity was referenced as 'the omniverse' fairly early in the series:
http://i.imgur.com/MNQ0C3v.jpg

But a few issues later, the chained Eternity was referenced as 'the multiverse':
http://i.imgur.com/qeqD5Km.jpg

However, Ewing seems to have settled on "multiverse" to describe Marvel's totality, as he uses that term with far more frequency as of late. In the most recent issue of Ultimates, for example, ALL of Marvel's eight previous continuua were referred to as "multiverses" by the First Firmament:
http://i.imgur.com/c8ItAAP.jpg

All of that being said, Owen's 'creation in a box' feat is still ridiculously uber, but I am absolutely confident in labeling it a multiversal showing. 👆

Probably 6. Definitely 7.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
You posted the entirety of the fight he did and another one as well all in one condenced post. Carver fuct that simple concept up as well

😆

Originally posted by Galan007
Ewing definitely uses the terms interchangeably.

The most blatant example that comes to mind is when the chained Eternity was referenced as 'the omniverse' fairly early in the series:
http://i.imgur.com/MNQ0C3v.jpg

But a few issues later, the chained Eternity was referenced as 'the multiverse':
http://i.imgur.com/qeqD5Km.jpg

However, Ewing seems to have settled on "multiverse" to describe Marvel's totality, as he uses that term with far more frequency as of late. In the most recent issue of Ultimates, for example, ALL of Marvel's eight previous continuua were referred to as "multiverses" by the First Firmament:
http://i.imgur.com/c8ItAAP.jpg

All of that being said, Owen's 'creation in a box' feat is still ridiculously uber, but I am absolutely confident in labeling it a multiversal showing. 👆

I get that, but how do you explain this, then?

Nrama: The solicitation for Ultimates #1 mentions the “Omniverse.” Is this the new construct that takes the place of the Multiverse in the wake of Secret Wars?

Ewing: I don't think it is officially - I just really like the word. In this context, it's everything that is - all reality, from the very outskirts like the Neutral Zone and Limbo, to the Superflow, to the various multiverses. The lot. So if we're talking about what's outside that - well, I've already seen people online doubting that there even can be an 'outside', so we know that it's going to be pretty damn cosmic. If The Ultimates are going out there - what's going to be waiting for them?

http://www.newsarama.com/26688-the-ultimates-get-pretty-damn-cosmic-in-new-ongoing.html

A bit contradictory, no?

Tbf Marvel has basically always used the two terms interchangeably, bar a few exceptions where people tried to explain a difference that was then ignored.

I mean Hickman's Avengers/NA to Secret Wars always says multiverse when they mean the entirety of existence. Even the Cap Britain Corps say multiverse from time to time and the term omniverse originated (in Marvel) from them back when Moore wrote it.

It's essentially semantics at this point.

As for the fight, they probably lose to T'challa.

Originally posted by AlmightyKfish
Tbf Marvel has basically always used the two terms interchangeably, bar a few exceptions where people tried to explain a difference that was then ignored.

I mean Hickman's Avengers/NA to Secret Wars always says multiverse when they mean the entirety of existence. Even the Cap Britain Corps say multiverse from time to time and the term omniverse originated (in Marvel) from them back when Moore wrote it.

It's essentially semantics at this point.

As for the fight, they probably lose to T'challa.

Marvel hasn't always used them interchangeably. Quasar, New exiles, and several handbooks have all mentioned that the omniverse encompasses the multiverse. That and the fact marvel has referenced (and even depicted) several times several multiverses (FF annual, Marvel Knights 4, Quasar, hell even Cable's title mentioned it and i recall also a marvel UK title mentioning it as well.)

The term actually originated before Captain Britain comics from what i recall. I remember a dr strange comic in the late 70s mentioning the term omniverse and also a thor letter's page in that time era. But back then it just wasn't properly defined yet.

Anyway, it's actually a very well established fact that Marvel does have multiple multiverses, so differentiating between the terms seems only logical, wouldn't you say?

Originally posted by operator616
I get that, but how do you explain this, then?

http://www.newsarama.com/26688-the-ultimates-get-pretty-damn-cosmic-in-new-ongoing.html

A bit contradictory, no?

As I mentioned, though: Ewing *seems* to have finally settled on 'multiverse' to describe Marvel's current superstructure. Moreover, he also described every one of Marvel's eight previous totalities as 'multiverses' as well... Which also falls perfectly in-line with Hickman's pre-SW cosmology, so I don't mind it too much. 👆