This quote - legit or no?

New Canon? Well, yeah. That's a given.

That's kind of the only way to function in a Legends centered debating forum given all the contradictions that occur in a lore as big as SW.

Originally posted by Geistalt
No quotes were published after [URL]By Azronger's standards, the quote is legit.

Originally posted by Geistalt
Apparently, Ulic 1-shots Marr.

Hell; Ulic 1-shots Meetra. Freezes lightsabers on a whim.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
By Az's standards Darth Revan > Exar Kun > Vitiate > Revan Reborn > Darth Revan. 🙂

I don't think Azronger would have Vitiate > Revan Reborn AFTER he fit this quote into his perspective tbh. So it'd be more like

Revan Reborn > Darth Revan > Exar Kun > PRE novel POST Nathema Vitiate which is more reasonable.

Or in other words, Kun's novel Vitiate wank is debunked. Big shame. 🙁

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Or in other words, Kun's novel Vitiate wank is debunked. Big shame. 🙁

Legend cries. Hopes die. 🙁

He means Kun wank off of novel Vitiate, y'know.

@Az Check my debate with Geisalt on Ood vs Vitiate.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Yep. Found the contradictory quote.

"Reaching out to the Force, Revan focused on the lid. After a moment it began to move, the edge grating along the lip of the lower half of the sarcophagus as it slowly rose into the air." - Revan.

Revan had to actually focus to accomplish the feat while an unlisted Sith like Nihilus could devastate a planet with a thought.

Enough for me to dismiss a quote that would contradict later quotes for Vitiate.

If you read the book, he later hurls the lid instantly when needed.

Also, canonically, "contradictions" are meant with on a "case-by-case" basis. Thus, even if Nihilus is above Revan, that doesn't mean the quote doesn't apply to all the other Sith.

No, it's not legit because Revan isn't canon. You people are retarded. Is it an officially marketed Star Wars product? Sure. Does it make or break an argument? No. Accolades shouldn't mean shit around here anyway, but for some reason we keep taking them seriously.

We're talking about Legends not Canon, Freshest.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Accolades shouldn't mean shit around here anyway, but for some reason we keep taking them seriously.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Also, canonically, "contradictions" are meant with on a "case-by-case" basis.

That may be your stance.

And Azronger's.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
That may be your stance.

Ill get a quote after my shower but I just saw it yesterday.

Also, rebuttal for Revan instantly moving the lid later?

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
We're talking about Legends not Canon, Freshest.

Nor where a 20-year-old comic book can.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
There is no Legends canon is the point. There is no alternate continuity out there in the ether were a blog about a figurine can make an argument for you.

I don't care what their policy is. This entire discussion is about our own approach to canon interpretation. If we all abided by the established canon policy we'd all have stances more in line with Azronger's, a terrifying thought, wouldn't you agree?

Give me the quote where he hurls it instantly.