Why are Rightists so submissive to people who give them orders

Started by Surtur10 pages
Surtur Restricted
Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
My posts certainly don't scream... hysterical much?

So you pretty much had nothing else to say when faced with that truth? Okie dokie.

Robtard Senor Member

Seems 11 out of 16 KMCers believe you Righties are "beta cucks". Ouch. Condolences.

Surtur Restricted

But looking at the country as a whole, leftists just play the role of the cuck more often.

UMT2jq-suyU&t

Bashar Teg Senior Mentat
Originally posted by Robtard
Seems 11 out of 16 KMCers believe you Righties are "beta cucks". Ouch. Condolences.

oh yeah? well *posts youtube links*. take THAT.

Surtur Restricted
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh yeah? well *posts youtube links*. take THAT.

I know, right, I could be more clever and post a meme. That is better, because reasons.

Bashar Teg Senior Mentat
Originally posted by Surtur
I know, right, I could be more clever and post a meme. That is better, because reasons.

i use memes to mock, not as some pitiful attempt at passing it off as a valid news source. [which btw you have done many many times, along with your idiotic youtube links.]

Surtur Restricted
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i use memes to mock, not as some pitiful attempt at passing it off as a valid news source. [which btw you have done many many times, along with your idiotic youtube links.]

The many times I have, did you disprove the news story?

Robtard Senor Member

You're still using your "it's true until disproven" method for the burden of proof it seems. Weird.

Claim: "Surtur sucks donkey dicks." Now is that true until you disprove it?

Surtur Restricted

Originally posted by Robtard
You're still using your "it's true until disproven" method for the burden of proof it seems. Weird.

Claim: "Surtur sucks donkey dicks." Now is that true until you disprove it?

I don't need to, I can just say "Rob sucks donkey dicks". So either both of us do, or neither of us do.

Which is it?

Robtard Senor Member

Under your rules you do. <-- the point

While I live in reality where the burden of proof lies on the person making the claim.

Surtur Restricted

Originally posted by Robtard
Under your rules you do. <-- the point

While I live in reality where the burden of proof lies on the person making the claim.

Lol dude, having been posting here for a while and seen you, overall? You do not occupy a space remotely resembling reality. Either that or you're just a troll. Which is it, if I may ask?

Robtard Senor Member

Not sure if the point went over your head or if you finally understand the error of your ways in switching the burden of proof around and you're just trying to save face now. I do hope it's the latter, as that would show some improvement, but I do fear it's the former.

Surtur Restricted

I have never said a youtube video is 100% full proof though, so if I ever post one that you feel is not...feel free to holla@ me.

Of course a youtube video can be wrong. If major news outlets like CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc. can be wrong? Yeah, a youtuber can.

darthgoober Senior Member

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
They tend to aspire to roles where they are told what to do.

Are they just beta's to their perceived "Betters"?

Unquestioning submissives to the status quo...

Is that why they yearn for and idolise "strong leaders".


They prob do it for the same reason leftist do it... they want to support the side that espouses more of their own personal beliefs. People on the other side(the left) are guilty of the same type of behavior.

Steve Zodiac Restricted
Originally posted by Robtard
Surtur sucks donkey dicks

Probably. Wikileaks?

Surtur Restricted
Originally posted by darthgoober
They prob do it for the same reason leftist do it... they want to support the side that espouses more of their own personal beliefs. People on the other side(the left) are guilty of the same type of behavior.

Shhh, they don't like to think about how cucky those on the left are. It's dem rightists.

darthgoober Senior Member

Originally posted by Surtur
Shhh, they don't like to think about how cucky those on the left are. It's dem rightists.

It's totally your right/decision to do so, but IMO you shouldn't perpetuate the whole "cuck" thing. Things like name calling never leads to a debate that has any kind of real resolution, it just makes it seem like you have no option other than to shame others out of disagreeing with you. And don't get me wrong because I know people on the left use the tactic en masse by saying that anyone who disagrees with their opinions are facist/racist/homophobes/misogynist and that it feels good to strike back with name calling of your own, but to a neutral party who's actually open to have their opinion changed the whole thing just looks like one giant cluster f*ck and probably won't even bother trying to sort through the mess to find your real arguments. It's basically awarding them a stalemate that they might otherwise lose. Similar to the way their "peaceful protests" so often turn into anarchy that get's the event they were opposed to shut down. The only way to "win" the argument is to let people hear the actual argument you're making and steer clear of the nonsense.

What's more, you should see that "cuck" as a slur is an insult of a different sort. When the left starts their name calling it's virtually always with an accusation of intolerance while the insult "cuck" is actually an indication of intolerance of a sort which supports the idea that you are an intolerant person. If some guy get's off watching his wife bang other guys then that's his deal. I'd personally be mortified to watch such a thing but hey... as long as people who like it aren't trying to tell me how to get my rocks off then I could care less what they do.

Steve Zodiac Restricted
Originally posted by darthgoober
Things like name calling never leads to a debate that has any kind of real resolution,

An online debate with a real resolution? 😕

darthgoober Senior Member

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
An online debate with a real resolution? 😕

I don't mean a resolution between the opposing sides themselves, but it can be resolved in the minds of those who are undecided. After all, the real purpose of a debate isn't to convince the person you're arguing against, it's to convince the audience who still haven't settled on an opinion.

Bashar Teg Senior Mentat
Originally posted by darthgoober
After all, the real purpose of a debate isn't to convince the person you're arguing against, it's to convince the audience who still haven't settled on an opinion.

actually it's both (in a non-political-circus shitshow setting, that is)