Originally posted by Rockydonovang
👆 You've addressed your post for me."Take my word for it" isn't an argument.
"I have nothing to respond with because I don't like the uncomfortable idea that Obama was not treated anywhere nearly as poorly as Trump is being treated. That would require that I face the notion that US liberals, specifically US democrats, are massive hypocrites."
-Rockydonovang circa 2017
this is what happens when things are so safe that the weak outnumber the strong. artificial safety nets embolden the weakest to become arrogant and comfortable.
the strong sacrifice to create an environment where the weak can thrive temporarily. human animals that would otherwise not be fit for survival multiply. then they criticize and destroy what the strong created for them.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
We have had this conversation before, and as was pointed out to him, the issue was not that Trump regularly enjoys having two scoops of ice cream for dessert. Rather, it is that when he is having two scoops of ice cream, he only allows everyone else who is dining with him to have one. That is some weird man-baby bullshit.
^ Bingo
Trumpers like him like to ignore context while crying foul. The same with Trump's water drinking, Trump wasn't mocked for stopping to drink water mid-speech, he was mocked because he mocked Marco Rubio for doing similar and now he does it
Originally posted by Robtard
^ BingoTrumpers like him like to ignore context while crying foul. The same with Trump's water drinking, Trump wasn't mocked for stopping to drink water mid-speech, he was mocked because he mocked Marco Rubio for doing similar and now he does it
Breaking news: Trump is a hypocrite.
Originally posted by Robtard
Because you seemed to be ignoring the point and focusing on something else, a correct something else, but the point ignored nonetheless...
That's not what happened. I commented on a point which was part of your post.
And you agreed with it while tacking on an unnecessary clarification.
So where's the problem?
Originally posted by Robtard
The ice-cream thing is silly, but you [still] ignoring specific context is what is actually petty
The context is dumb as hell. Stop whining over petty bullshit. Nobody cares if Trump wanted a second scoop.
If you want to be taken seriously then act like it. Don't whine over ice cream or how he feeds fish.
If you are incapable of this, or if you can't help but try to justify it, you have issues.
As previously shown to you, the "scandal" isn't that Trump eats two scoops of ice-cream, is that he insist other people only be allowed one. Still silly as f--k, but the proper context really paints Trump like a man-child and not those reporting on it.
The fact you need to spin something so silly to make Trump look better is really telling.
Originally posted by Robtard
As previously shown to you, the "scandal" isn't that Trump eats two scoops of ice-cream, is that he insist other people only be allowed one. Still silly as f--k, but the proper context really paints Trump like a man-child and not those reporting on it.The fact you need to spin something so silly to make Trump look better really telling.
But no, there is NO SCANDAL. None at all. Trump got an extra scoop of ice cream. Stop whining. Who did that help, do you think? Who benefited from the whining, which people were not against Trump until folks whined about the ice cream? Explain how you don't look like a petty little kid.
How does this make people take what you or those like you seriously?
Originally posted by Surtur
But no, there is NO SCANDAL. None at all. Trump got an extra scoop of ice cream. Stop whining. Who did that help, do you think? Who benefited from the whining, which people were not against Trump until folks whined about the ice cream? Explain how you don't look like a petty little kid.
^ Still spinning
Originally posted by Robtard
he [Trump] insist(s) other people only be allowed one [scoop of ice cream].
Is this REALLY true? Please tell me this shit you guys have been half-assed discussing for days, now, is false. That it's just an out of context libtard spin on what actually happened.
Surely he's not like the Japanese (?) Emperors where you could not sit higher than the emperor.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Is this REALLY true? Please tell me this shit you guys have been half-assed discussing for days, now, is false. That it's just an out of context libtard spin on what actually happened.Surely he's not like the Japanese (?) Emperors where you could not sit higher than the emperor.
The article on CNN I just read makes it seem like his team knows he takes 2 scoops of ice cream with pie so they made sure he got two, while everyone else got one. Lol...
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/politics/trump-time-magazine-ice-cream/index.html
So it's just about petty little kids acting like petty little kids over this. And then morons try to defend it, it's not the ice cream yo, it's what it symbolizes! Utter lunacy.
Trump invited reporters to a four-course dinner in the Blue Room, and they reported the following culinary demands:
[list][*]Trump is to be served Diet Coke, everyone else are only to be served tap water.
[*]Trump is to be served sauce with his chicken, everyone else are to be served none.
[*]Trump is to be served two scoops of ice cream with his dessert, everyone else are to be served only one.[/list]
They also reported that he has a special wooden box on his desk in the Oval Office containing a single button which he uses to order glasses of Coca-Cola.
This inspired people to mock him on social media:
"Big boy gets two scoops for having a big boy day!" —K. Thor Jensen
"Double ice cream; Double cake? What is trump? Nine years old?" —Dave Firth
"i'll never get used to the 'literally a giant baby' aspect of the Trump presidency." —Jamie K.