If you're saying that Anakin's standing is not relevant to Revan and thus you don't understand why this particular thread was made I'd point you to the biased puppet master of KMC and his conflicts of interest in this regard.
It's an experiment to see if you're all so completely under his control you'd alter Anakin or Revan's placement simply to avoid conflict with him.
It's an unrelated topic entirely, so I'm wondering why this debate is happening. I mean it's pretty obvious what you're doing, but others in this thread legitimately fall back on, "LMFAO Anakin isn't Sidious level," as if that is at all relevant. I mean, unless they can't prove Revan beats AotC Anakin. Maybe they're just that sad.
No version of Anakin, barring Mortis Anakin, has anything better than Revan's best feats. Contending with and overpowering (on several occasions) the strike teams he faced on Yavin is superior to anything Anakin has achieved on its own. Hell, most of Revan's best feats in KOTOR are on par with, if not better than, most of Anakin's best combative feats.
I'm having trouble taking this seriously though, the idea that you might actually think AOTC Anakin is superior to ANY version of Revan is something that dumbfounds me.
Originally posted by darthbane77
Those undetermined strike teams, where no one dies, where Revan just flat out loses is a good showing for Revan. Revan beat a teenager and some dude we already knew he could beat. This makes him great.I don't have to make arguments. I just say things, and people agree because I said them.
I agree. Because you said it.