Why didn't Grievous let Talzin kill Dooku?

Started by Kurk1 pages

Why didn't Grievous let Talzin kill Dooku?

Dooku had screwed over Grievous before (Lair of Grievous) and letting Dooku die would've made him supreme leader of the CIS.

So why did he?

EDIT: Nvm. 🙁

Don't be shy, this is a safe space 🙂

even if he wanted to he would've had to deal with Sidious after, even grievous isn't that dumb

Welcome to the wonderful world of Clone Wars plot holes

Originally posted by relentless1
even if he wanted to he would've had to deal with Sidious after, even grievous isn't that dumb

Wouldn't have been that bad considering Sidious was nearing the time for Anakin's final phase.

Granted that Grievous didn't know that.

'Cause Palps needed him to convert Anakin.

I'm fairly sure Grievous had no clue about Sheev's plans. What would Sidious have known if Talzin did kill him? It was Dooku's independent mission.

He didn't need to explain it; he just had to get Grievous to comply.

Kurk is a f-ucking imbecile again, nothing to see here.

Lel.

Srs tho Grievous wasn't interested in leading the Confederacy, he didn't care about the politics, he just wanted to wage war and kill Jedi.

Kurk probably didn't watch RotS where Grievous was taken aback by Dooku's death.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Kurk probably didn't watch RotS where Grievous was taken aback by Dooku's death.
Yes, I'm sure that was a genuine response.

Originally posted by Kurk
Yes, I'm sure that was a genuine response.

It's almost as sure as you being an inbred autistic.

So we're 95% sure it's legit?

*99%