Is the Plagueis > All Sith Lords Before Him Blurb Indisputably Canon?

Started by nfactor19953 pages

Is the Plagueis > All Sith Lords Before Him Blurb Indisputably Canon?

The question is the title: Is the Plagueis > All Sith Lords before him blurb from the back of the Plagueis novel indisputably a canon fact (in the Legends continuity, more so for the purposes of this thread)? If you don't believe that it is, what is the argument against it being canonical fact?

Not this again...

It is.
/thread

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Not this again...

Originally posted by Ursumeles
It is.
/thread

Lovely. Just lovely

yawn.

Nothing's indesputable, but yes, it's canon. This has been debated to death already.

No

Originally posted by Raptor22
No
And that about sums up the argument against. 🙁

Originally posted by Beniboybling
And that about sums up the argument against. 🙁
lol. It might not be as long as the pro blurb sides argument which boils down to- I like plagueis alot so I really really want it to be true.

But fortunately for me I don't need a detailed argument because I'm right.

kek

Originally posted by Ursumeles
It is.
/thread

This, let's not stop asking obvious questions.

Originally posted by Raptor22
lol. It might not be as long as the pro blurb sides argument which boils down to- I like plagueis alot so I really really want it to be true.

But fortunately for me I don't need a detailed argument because I'm right.

😂

Originally posted by Beniboybling
😂

Originally posted by Azronger
Nothing's indesputable, but yes, it's canon. This has been debated to death already.

Amd where is that indesputable evidence?

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Amd where is that indesputable evidence?

Nothing's indisputable, as I said, but the evidence can ve found in Chee's statement that anything produced by a Lucas company is canon, and since the blurb was produced by Lucasbooks, it's canon.

If Sidious is GOAT then Plagueis would have to be a solid second place would he not?

Originally posted by Azronger
Nothing's indisputable, as I said, but the evidence can ve found in Chee's statement that anything produced by a Lucas company is canon, and since the blurb was produced by Lucasbooks, it's canon.

You are misinterpreting that statement.

Lucas is not the publisher of that novel, Del Rey is. And only Del Rey issued that blurb to promote its work.

Lucas only acknowledged the story as a contribution to the literature body of the lore. Therefore, its logo on the backcover.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You are misinterpreting that statement.

Lucas is not the publisher of that novel, Del Rey is. And only Del Rey issued that blurb to promote its work.

Lucas only acknowledged the story as a contribution to the literature body of the lore. Therefore, its logo on the backcover.

Lucas didn't, obviously. But Lucasbooks did 👆

You can find that on Infinities comics too. 😂