These guys with Adamantium bones

Started by Stoic2 pages

These guys with Adamantium bones

Pretend that these guys underwent the same process that Wolverine underwent, and everything went as well for them as it did for Wolverine.

Would it be a downgrade, or an upgrade?

Thor
Superman
Hulk
Wonder Woman
Wonder Man
Lobo

Are their original bone structures superior or inferior?

Thor - downgrade
Superman - downgrade
Wonder Woman - downgrade
Wonder Man -unsure
Lobo upgrade (wolverine on steroids)
hulk -

I guess i can see it being an upgrade to the characters (minus WM with his on again off again energy form), though Hulk wouldnt be able to shift form anymore.

Durability-wise, it'd be a huge upgrade for all of them.

Has Wolverine ever had one of his bones broken, like, eg, how Doomsday broke Superman's arm? Didn't DD also break Wonder Woman's arms?

I think the adamantium would be an upgrade for all of them, but not to the same degree, and certainly not like it was for Wolvie.

Aside from arguably poisoning, I don't see how it could be a disadvantage for anyone

Like i said, dont think it'd mesh with Simon. Or any energy being.

The Adamantium bonding process creates a FUSION of bone and Adamantium that acts like the bone did originally including production of blood platelets etc so it's only an upgrade unless....the individual lacks the healing factor and/or immunity to the poisoning having Adamantium bones would cause them over time.

None of the characters listed should have any issues with that

Is Wonder Woman Actually BULLET PROOF? Or is that one of those things that seems to change on a somewhat regular basis?

Agree to disagree. Fusion of not, metal isnt bone.

I don't think there's any way to look at it as a downgrade for any of them, but for Superman, Thor and Hulk It probably won't make that much of a difference either way.

I'll stick with i figure; Hulk would be stuck and WM is incompatible.

Originally posted by Cogito
Aside from arguably poisoning, I don't see how it could be a disadvantage for anyone

It would dimish the HF of some.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Is Wonder Woman Actually BULLET PROOF? Or is that one of those things that seems to change on a somewhat regular basis? [/B]

She's durable as f*ck against everything except sharp objects like bullets and swords. It's why she uses her bracers to block a lot of things instead of just tanking it.

Originally posted by riv6672
I'll stick with i figure; Hulk would be stuck and WM is incompatible.

Hulk could probably still revert to Banner if forced to, but it'd result in his death.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
I don't think there's any way to look at it as a downgrade for any of them, but for Superman, Thor and Hulk It probably won't make that much of a difference either way.
If we're talking resistance to brute force attacks, this holds particularly true for Superman, imo. If someone is strong enough to break his bones, I highly doubt an Adamantium fusion would make the difference... For example: had Superman's bones been laced with Adamantium vs. H/P Doomsday, I still don't think the end result of this attack would have been any different:

srug

______________________________

That said, an area where an Adamantium skeletal structure likely *would* help Superman is against...say...Kryptonite projectiles. It should help prevent the projectile(s) in question from directly striking some of his vital/key organs(particularly the brain and heart.)

Originally posted by Galan007
If we're talking resistance to brute force attacks, this holds particularly true for Superman, imo. If someone is strong enough to break his bones, I highly doubt an Adamantium fusion would make the difference... For example: had Superman's bones been laced with Adamantium vs. H/P Doomsday, I still don't think the end result of this attack would have been any different:

srug

______________________________

That said, an area where an Adamantium skeletal structure likely *would* help Superman is against...say...Kryptonite projectiles. It should help prevent the projectile(s) in question from directly striking some of his vital/key organs(particularly the brain and heart.)

👆

For what it's worth, the same guy who had Doomsday do that wrote this:
https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/7/72524/1777545-superman_adamantium.jpg

mmm

Supes would hear crickets chirping if he said this to the X-Men ...

Originally posted by psycho gundam
The Adamantium bonding process creates a FUSION of bone and Adamantium that acts like the bone did originally including production of blood platelets etc so it's only an upgrade

It created adamantium beta only thanks to Wolverine's HF, iirc. As it induced a molecular change in the metal during the bonding process.

But since OP wants us to assume everything went perfect, it's pretty much pointless nitpicking so much.

All of them would benefit from the unbreakable skeletal structure. Not sure about Simon and his Ionic form, it's not exactly consistent.

Originally posted by Galan007
If we're talking resistance to brute force attacks, this holds particularly true for Superman, imo. If someone is strong enough to break his bones, I highly doubt an Adamantium fusion would make the difference... For example: had Superman's bones been laced with Adamantium vs. H/P Doomsday, I still don't think the end result of this attack would have been any different:

srug

______________________________

That said, an area where an Adamantium skeletal structure likely *would* help Superman is against...say...Kryptonite projectiles. It should help prevent the projectile(s) in question from directly striking some of his vital/key organs(particularly the brain and heart.)

Superman arm would've been ok if it was laced with Adamantium. Don't know where you get the idea Doomsday could break adamantium.