How to Save the World From Climate Change? KILL MORE BABIES!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
okay, have fun projecting your rage-addiction onto others. 👆

Damn, we got to the "you must be projecting" part awfully quick today.

i mocked a crappy comic and you did your personal attack tantrum thing. but no, clearly it is i who am a thin skinned rage-addict, not you. 👆

Said the guy(?) that finds KATHY funny.

the crack-cocaine is rotting your brain. i said she is the #1 not-funny fail comic ever. read it again and report back 👆

Re-Read a Kathy Comic or a Basher Post.

Neither sound all that appealing to be honest.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i mocked a crappy comic and you did your personal attack tantrum thing. but no, clearly it is i who am a thin skinned rage-addict, not you. 👆

^
He has a point here, Surtur. I also mocked the Dilbert comic and you clearly took it personally with your "no liberals are the cucks!" retort. Which was odd and weird to watch.

Flow of discussion in this thread is more funny than Dilbert comics. 👆

Let's start with rage-addict man-babies. Two birds, one stone.

Or the SJW Snowflake Degenerate Cry-Babies.

Says the alt-righter whose party is full of men who love to get their women ****ed by others. Lol.

Says the SociNazi that crys when Men point out that he can't really change his/hers/its gender with the Power of..

Originally posted by Robtard
^
He has a point here, Surtur. I also mocked the Dilbert comic and you clearly took it personally with your "no liberals are the cucks!" retort. Which was odd and weird to watch.

But he doesn't have a point. Especially with your reply, I said "TBF, liberals are cucks too".

Then you stroll in with "well, you clearly took it personally" and the why for that is turns out to be...cuz you said I took it personally.

I just love it how you guys can talk all the shit you want, but if someone else does they are enraged, taking it personally, etc.

Let's play the consistency game: Fly makes a comment about snowflakes, the response is...

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Says the alt-righter whose party is full of men who love to get their women ****ed by others. Lol.

Now, did this person take what was said personally? Cuz "TBF so are most liberals"....if that is taking it personally, this response would have to also be doing so, correct? I know you won't say I'm correct here, what I'm really looking for are what silly reasons you'll use for why.

Originally posted by Surtur
But he doesn't have a point. Especially with your reply, I said "TBF, liberals are cucks too".

Then you stroll in with "well, you clearly took it personally" and the why for that is turns out to be...cuz you said I took it personally.

I just love it how you guys can talk all the shit you want, but if someone else does they are enraged, taking it personally, etc.

Let's play the consistency game: Fly makes a comment about snowflakes, the response is...

Why do you lie when it's so obvious. Facts: I called Dilbert a "cuck", you replied with "liberals are cucks". Considering you believe me to be a liberal, that was meant as an attack on me because I insulted a comic strip character you clearly like.

You then did similar with Bashar. Facts: He mocked Dilbert, you took it as a personal insult and attacked him.

I don't actively read Fly's post, not since November, so your defense point is pointless. That's a fact too.

Originally posted by Surtur
But he doesn't have a point. Especially with your reply, I said "TBF, liberals are cucks too".

Then you stroll in with "well, you clearly took it personally" and the why for that is turns out to be...cuz you said I took it personally.

I just love it how you guys can talk all the shit you want, but if someone else does they are enraged, taking it personally, etc.

Let's play the consistency game: Fly makes a comment about snowflakes, the response is...

Now, did this person take what was said personally? Cuz "TBF so are most liberals"....if that is taking it personally, this response would have to also be doing so, correct? I know you won't say I'm correct here, what I'm really looking for are what silly reasons you'll use for why.

You cuck for Surtur and enjoy it, just admit it Grimey.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
I didn't even read your post, I was responding to fly

Irrelevant to the point: did you take Fly's response personally?

Originally posted by Robtard
Why do you lie when it's so obvious. Facts: I called Dilbert a "cuck", you replied with "liberals are cucks". Considering you believe me to be a liberal, that was meant as an attack on me because I insulted a comic strip character you clearly like.

It was a comment about liberals in general, but that was a nice try. Also stop saying things are "clear". I don't give a shit about Dilbert lol. Cuz you think I called you a cuck and Bash out for his stupidity of "derp find me a funny comic" it means I like Dilbert and am upset? Nope.

You then did similar with Bashar. Facts: He mocked Dilbert, you took it as a personal insult and attacked him.

Lol you need to stop passing off your opinion as fact. I didn't take it as some personal insult. Calling someone a piece of shit or something along those lines is not an implication of being enraged or having taken something personally.

I don't actively read Fly's post, not since November, so your defense point is pointless. That's a fact too.

There is no defense, because there is nothing in need of defending. I'm simply pointing out your lack of consistency.

Originally posted by Surtur
Irrelevant to the point: did you take Fly's response personally?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]You cuck for Surtur and enjoy it, just admit it Grimey. [/B]

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
No. I didn't, that's why my reply wasn't a personal attack either.

That's downright logical.