Oh Leftist Progressives....

Started by Robtard20 pages
Originally posted by Beniboybling
An armed response team arrived two minutes after the attack was reported yeah, all the terrorists were killed after 8 minutes. But when Surtur's primary news sources are Heat Street, the Blaze and maybe Trump's twitter, we can hardly expect him to be informed. 🙁

Two whole minutes? Yup, Surtur is correct, it "but it could have been much sooner."

As they say over there, what a bellend

Originally posted by Robtard
Two whole minutes? Yup, Surtur is correct, it could have been "a lot sooner".

Indeed, if all of the cops had been armed it could have been.

Originally posted by Surtur
Your retort was obviously superior. Why? Reasons.
My retort actually rebutted your point yeah, now you try.

Originally posted by Surtur
Indeed, if all of the cops had been armed it could have been.

It's clear you've once again stuck your shit-laden foot in your mouth due to your uninformed brain and instead of just going "okay, my comment was stupid in light of this new info" like an adult, you'll continue to clown about, cos you.

Originally posted by Robtard
Two whole minutes? Yup, Surtur is correct, it "but it could have been much sooner."

As they say over there, what a bellend

When you are getting stabbed by a nut with a machete 2 minutes can seem like a REAL LONG TIME to have to wait on a cop to save you.

Which for that one lady who didn't get save. It was 2 minutes too long.

Originally posted by Robtard
what a bellend
🙂 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
It's clear you've once again stuck your shit-laden foot in your mouth due to your uninformed brain and instead of just going "okay, my comment was stupid in light of this new info" like an adult, you'll continue to clown about, cos you.

You lecturing others on how to behave like adults is priceless.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
My retort actually rebutted your point yeah, now you try.

It didn't rebut the point, because there were still cops on the scene without weapons. Anything else?

TIL: A two minute response time is unacceptable. UK authorities need to respond in less than a minute or they're lame/shit

Originally posted by Surtur
It didn't rebut the point, because there were still cops on the scene without weapons. Anything else?
No, because like I said, the situation was responded to rapidly regardless.

Originally posted by Robtard
TIL: A two minute response time is unacceptable. UK authorities need to respond in less than a minute or they're lame/shit

Did any cops show up to deal with terrorists that didn't have guns? Yes or no.

Try to think about how much damage can be done in even just 60 seconds.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
No, because like I said, the situation was responded to rapidly regardless.

Cool, so reports I read of cops without guns were wrong, my mistake.

The entire situation was handled in 8 minutes, this is a terrorist attack where shit is likely going crazy, people are running, screaming etc.

You: "but it could have been much sooner." (your words)

Well it isn't like London isn't always on a High Alert for Terror nowadays,plus the attack started at London Bridge a rather heavy traffic and tourist area right in the middle of a Major City where police probably always have a pretty heavy presence. and this attack did just happen not all that long after Manchester so yeah. Robbie's little comments are all pretty pointless .

Originally posted by Robtard
The entire situation was handled in 8 minutes, this is a terrorist attack where shit is likely going crazy, people are running, screaming etc.

You: "but it could have been much sooner." (your words)

Yes, my words. Did you have some other shit to f*cking whine about?

Now that you've stopped shitting on UK authorities (who did a fine job by all accounts) due to being shamed, would you care to shit on London's Mayor?

Calm down Surt, what the man is trying to point out is that you are wrong. The terrorists couldn't have been dealt with much sooner, and where instead dealt with very rapidly. The presence of unarmed police officers on the scene is a red herring, as the aforementioned remains true regardless. You attempted to make out that the police response to this incident was poor, when in fact the opposite is true.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Well it isn't like London isn't always on a High Alert for Terror nowadays,plus the attack started at London Bridge a rather heavy traffic and tourist area right in the middle of a Major City where police probably always have a pretty heavy presence. and this attack did just happen not all that long after Manchester so yeah. Robbie's little comments are all pretty pointless . [/B]
Facts which would have had a relative impact on any police response, unarmed or unarmed. 😬

So this couldn't have been dealt with sooner if all cops were armed? Okay, nice opinion.

Right, nice attempt to reword your claim, totally spotted by no one. 😂

Sure. I bet that the Unarmed Responding Officer could have talked the terrorist out of attacking people or maybe gotten him/herself killed instead or more likely with the victims too. Cause that would have been better.

The Left loves big piles of victims. They love to shore their moral high ground up on them.