Originally posted by Surtur
Lol so this boils down to you whining about a word being used in a debate? Okay. Any other words you wanna make off limits? Just make a list.
it's not just that it's derogatory, but that it lacks any clear definition besides how you and others choose to apply it.
an example of a valid-yet-derogatory title would be "trumper", which means simply "one who supports trump". or "libtard", which obviously refers to liberals. "sjw" is nonspecific, much like "massive ph@ggot".
but you already admitted that it's all just shitposting troll-drivel, so i guess we're done here.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's not just that it's derogatory, but that it lacks any clear definition besides how you and others choose to apply it.an example of a valid-yet-derogatory title would be "trumper", which means simply "one who supports trump". or "libtard", which obviously refers to liberals. "sjw" is nonspecific, much like "massive ph@ggot".
but you already admitted that it's all just shitposting troll-drivel, so i guess we're done here.
Why do we need a clear definition? To me it means someone who perfects social justice, and yeah that has a broad definition. I just find it funny you seem to be forgetting where we are. This forum is nearly dead, and yes there is shit posting. This has been admitted before.
Originally posted by Bashar TegI retain the right to use the term "massive phaggot" in online debates where it is appropriate, like when Surtur is being a massive phaggot.
it's not just that it's derogatory, but that it lacks any clear definition besides how you and others choose to apply it.an example of a valid-yet-derogatory title would be "trumper", which means simply "one who supports trump". or "libtard", which obviously refers to liberals. "sjw" is nonspecific, much like "massive ph@ggot".
but you already admitted that it's all just shitposting troll-drivel, so i guess we're done here.
Originally posted by NemeBro
I retain the right to use the term "massive phaggot" in online debates where it is appropriate, like when Surtur is being a massive phaggot.
that's cool, as long as you don't post a thread "do massive phaggots suffer from mental illness" and expect rational criticism against specific political leanings.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"conservative" is a definable title, as well as non-derogatory. so fail on both counts. or are you just being cooltroll and shitposting again? i can't tell.
The title implies a generalization of all conservatives, but you already knew that.
Don't worry I didn't actually expect you to say anything. I know it's okay when you guys post topics to talk shit.
Originally posted by Surtur
Why play games? We both know the topic was created specifically in response to the SJW topic, and it's there to shit talk about the various shit conservatives do.
oh i get it. you're crying because someone posted an opposing strawman topic. if you were not the top contributor and cheerleader of the original strawman topic, you might have had a case. but none of this has to do with the fact that 'sjw' is an undefinable and stupid name to place on any political group.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh i get it. you're crying because someone posted an opposing strawman topic. if you were not the top contributor and cheerleader of the original strawman topic, you might have had a case. but none of this has to do with the fact that 'sjw' is an undefinable and stupid name to place on any political group.
Lol I'm not crying, I'm merely pointing out the nature of the topic. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy, in other words.
SJW has a broad definition, but this is not a professional debate.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol I'm not crying, I'm merely pointing out the nature of the topic. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy, in other words.SJW has a broad definition, but this is not a professional debate.
it's not hypocrisy. you're just misunderstanding and conflating issues as usual.
issue #1: strawman fallacy is not logical (unless surt does it, but that's okay because 'haha i toll u'😉
issue #2: 'sjw' is a stupid and undefinable term in any political context
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's not hypocrisy. you're just misunderstanding and conflating issues as usual.issue #1: strawman fallacy is not logical (unless surt does it, but that's okay because trolololo)
issue #2: 'sjw' is a stupid and undefinable term in any political context
The fact that the poster has in the past whined about generalizing things and then made such a topic is indeed hypocrisy.
Nobody cares if you think SJW is undefinable. We are not conducting professional debates here.
Originally posted by Surtur
The fact that the poster has in the past whined about generalizing things and then made such a topic is indeed hypocrisy.
i view it as giving you a taste of your own medicine (which you promptly spit out and cried 'injustice'.
Originally posted by Surtur
Nobody cares if you think SJW is undefinable.
nobody appeals to the stone like surt appeals to the stone.
Originally posted by Surtur
We are not conducting professional debates here.
is that your excuse for never having a reasonable sober argument to defend? good luck with that. 👆
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i view it as giving you a taste of your own medicine (which you promptly spit out and cried 'injustice'.
Lmao, I love how you always have some sort of excuse for the behavior. It just makes it even more funny when you act like you're a serious debater.
is that your excuse for never having a reasonable sober argument to defend? good luck with that. 👆
I truly find your lack of self awareness fascinating, especially because you have tried to accuse me of the same thing in the past.