Originally posted by Darth Thor
Got confused between this post and the other...Maul wasn't injured in Canon.
I think Kenobi's performance was about much more than him simply being angry. He likely improved through that fight, and then was determined to "right the wrong" done to Qui-Gon, much like when Adi Gallia died in TCW.
Unlike Kanan who simply had a "Force" moment against Maul.
And are we debating canon only?
He didn't "improve" throughout that fight. If he was fighting better then normally then it was temporary.
I'm not using Kanan's performance against Maul as apart of my argument.