Trump using White Phosphorus in Syria

Started by carthage2 pages

Trump using White Phosphorus in Syria

Remember when Trump bombed an Airstrip in Syria over Assad supposedly using chemical weapons? Apparently Trump is ok with US associated forces using White phosphorus

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/11/us-led-forces-accused-dropping-white-phosphorous-raqqa/

US-led forces in Syria have been accused of dropping white phosphorous on districts in eastern Raqqa, as it battles to liberate the city from the Islamic State.

Video footage released by Amaq, the news agency run by Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (Isil), appears to show the deadly substance falling on the Syrian capital on two separate occasions.

Raqqa is Being Saughtered Silently, an anti-Isil campaign group, has also released similar images on social media.

The use of white phosphorous in densely populated areas is banned under international law, though military forces are allowed to use it to create smoke screens

coolstorybro

Originally posted by Blackknighting
coolstorybro

call him a cuck, xyz. that'll show him. then go stalk some children.

Re: Trump using White Phosphorus in Syria

Sincerely hope this is fake news propaganda.

Re: Re: Trump using White Phosphorus in Syria

Originally posted by Robtard
Sincerely hope this is fake news propaganda.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/10/world/middleeast/raqqa-syria-white-phosphorus.html?_r=0

looks like it's not fake

Re: Trump using White Phosphorus in Syria

Originally posted by carthage
Remember when Trump bombed an Airstrip in Syria over Assad supposedly using chemical weapons? Apparently Trump is ok with US associated forces using White phosphorus

It\s horrible if true, but right now this appears to be nothing more than an accusation.

If true we need to know who ordered this stuff to be used.

Re: Re: Trump using White Phosphorus in Syria

Originally posted by Surtur
It\s horrible if true, but right now this appears to be nothing more than an accusation.

If true we need to know who ordered this stuff to be used.

let's pretend for a minute that it turned out to be trump's order.
got that mental picture? good. now tell me: why is it totally okay, now?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/10/world/middleeast/raqqa-syria-white-phosphorus.html?_r=0

looks like it's not fake

The use against personal/civilians, specifically. As that is a war crime apparently and I would prefer our President didn't involve himself with war crimes.

So Trump dropped a little Light in their Lives. Boo Hoo!!!!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]So Trump dropped a little Light in their Lives. Boo Hoo!!!!

[/B]

what a hateful little old man you are.

........and your point is?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
what a hateful little old man you are.

Sickening post from Fly... Still can't get my head round that.

Originally posted by Robtard
The use against personal/civilians, specifically. As that is a war crime apparently and I would prefer our President didn't involve himself with war crimes.

I believe and I know and work with many Americans, all the ones I know regardless of political stripe would agree with you.

Re: Re: Re: Trump using White Phosphorus in Syria

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
let's pretend for a minute that it turned out to be trump's order.
got that mental picture? good. now tell me: why is it totally okay, now?

Damn this post is full of failure. Not only did I not say it's okay if it turns out Trump ordered it, even suggestions of "you implied it!" are completely off the table here as well. That sucks.

If he had used Black Phosphorus we probably wouldn't be having this conversation.

One would think if Trump had truly ordered a chemical attack in Syria this would be far bigger news than it seems to be.

because we all know how transparent the trump administration is, as well as the pentagon. 👆

His is CRYSTAL compared to the previous administration.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
because we all know how transparent the trump administration is, as well as the pentagon. 👆

So it's the lack of transparency that has made it so we don't have that much yapping from the press over this?

Interesting.

if there is no more inside information leaked, what is there to report? lack of further reports doesnt invalidate the allegations, snowflake. there really is no proof either way, but the fact that you're trying hard to assert that it's not real is...well...exactly as pathetic and childish as you've always proven to be.