Especially if you're in the Yakuza.
Our criminal elements are underground and in constant competition with each other, but them, they're out in the open and have a monopoly on everything. Corner offices, semi-legit status, and they've assassinated politicians openly.
No one armed to worry about, after all.
Yikes, the past few weeks for the NYT have not been kind.
Backlash forces NY Times to issue major correction to controversial GOP baseball shooting editorial
Originally posted by Lestov16
Gotta love the right wing double standard"Just because two radical Trump supporters beat up a homeless Hispanic American man and urinated on him doesn't mean they were motivated by Trump's rhetoric"
Also Trump supporters
"That radical leftist shooter who shot those Republican congressmen was definitely motivated by liberal rhetoric"
Gotta love the stupid bullshit from leftists who feel it's okay to whine at Trump and hold him accountable for things his supporters do, but who cry and cry over it when that gets directed at them.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Yes, I'm sure Japan's criminal elements would be very upset if they were allowed easy access to firearms. 😕
They can get weapons just fine. It's everyone else they'd be upset about.
But I'm sure a gunless, homocide low state of oppression looks find to your common leftest.. Provided they're not the one's living in such a state.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I was actually questioning the double standards of those who think bringing politics up when terrorism happens is immoral but that politicizing shootings is somehow moral, not the other way around, but since you're saying politicizing terrorism is okay but politicizing shootings isn't, I fundamentally disagree with you there too.And I'm not even necessarily advocating gun control when I say this, all I'm saying is that it's a double standard for people to say it's immoral to politicize one of them but immoral to politicize the other. Whether or not the policies they propose are good or bad or whether or not you can out-debate them on the issue in question is irrelevant to whether or not it's morally wrong or justified to bring politics into a discussion about a recent tragedy.
It's different when they do it, that is it lol. My favorite is that moron Shaun King. Who, yes, has in the past said Trump should be held responsible for the shit his supporters do.
Guess if he thinks Bernie is somehow responsible for this? It would be a consistent line of thought, no? So of course he...ha just kidding, he knows Bernie isn't responsible. When I say he knows I mean...dude knows: he said he knows with complete confidence this ain't on Bernie. See, aren't you glad that was cleared up?
Originally posted by cdtmRight. And this is why Japan has the lowest amount of gun crime in the world?
They can get weapons just fine. It's everyone else they'd be upset about.But I'm sure a gunless, homocide low state of oppression looks find to your common leftest.. Provided they're not the one's living in such a state.
But sure, a country in which people aren't allowed killing weapons and don't kill people with them looks nice and rosy to me.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Right. And this is why Japan has the lowest amount of gun crime in the world?But sure, a country in which people aren't allowed killing weapons and don't kill people with them looks nice and rosy to me.
Listen, there is absolute zero proof that regulating or making something outright illegal has any impact on how said item(s) is more or less accessible. Stupid Libtard!
Originally posted by Robtard
You missed the point again, sore-one 🙁
Originally posted by riv6672
Not at all, Francis, i just addressed the better one you apparently made by accident (broken clock and all that...).
Its cool though, aside from condolences to the victims, and amusement at how crappy the posters here are, i'm not looking to post in this thread.
You're safe.
Strawman bashing and a pretend victory over a non-existent fight on my end. Congratulations are in order I guess, well done, sir.