Composite Grievous vs ROTS Kenobi

Started by Dispray1 pages

Composite Grievous vs ROTS Kenobi

Grievous with all of his feats
vs
ROTS Kenobi
Sabers only with aug
All out
Neutral ground
Starting distance 10 meters
Morals on

Kenobi obviously.

Why obviously? Kenobi defeated the weakest version of Grievous (ROTS) while Grievous from LOE stalemated Windu. And since this is composite Grievous which also includes OCW feats, he would at least provide a much harder fight to Kenobi than in ROTS.

in single clash of blades which results in grevious feeling dooku was right about him eventually becoming scrap doesn't constitute a stalemate.

It'd be nice if people stopped trying to use TCW maul and Grevious's fights vs Mace so draw such conclusions

Um, RotS Grievous is GG's peak.

yea, not seeing why sabers should be any different here. Additionally, grevious faced Kenobi before he likely had the largest emotional confrontation in his life being forced to let go of his attachment to Anakin.

it could certainly be argued there's a gap between the Kenobi who faced grevious, and the one who cut Anakin's legs in two.