Most of Anerica's terrorists are White and not Muslim
New Study shows majority of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil are not by Muslims. But by White Supremacists:
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_594c46e4e4b0da2c731a84df/amp
Most of Anerica's terrorists are White and not Muslim
New Study shows majority of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil are not by Muslims. But by White Supremacists:
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_594c46e4e4b0da2c731a84df/amp
Originally posted by StigmaBut the percentage of non white Muslims is very small, although possibly they are more likely to be radical.
Not sure why compare an ideology (Islam) to a race (being White) in the title? <shrug>You do realize you can be White and Muslim?
The stories indicate they are whites of racial supremacy ideology as DT indicates.
So more terrorists in the US are of white supremacist ideology, which has even fewer non-likely ethnic groups in it.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Maybe you should try getting them reading comprehensions, friend. 👆
I clearly stated that he compares race to ideology in the title of the thread.
"White supremacist movement" as an ideology was specified in his post. The title is misleading.👆
I'm a little confused about the intent of the article. I can't tell if it's supposed to come off as making Muslims look better or worse.
On one hand it's basically saying to us - hey Muslims aren't as bad of a group as u might think, here's another group that commits even more terrorists attacks than them.
On the other hand, the group that they're comparing Muslims to are freaking white supremacist groups. Groups whose core ideals revolve around hate.
It seems more of a backhanded compliment than anything, basically telling us that at least Muslims aren't as bad as the Aryan Nation and the Klan (i mean really, how shitty of a compliment is that) and they've committed less attacks, but then throw this in there also.
"However, the sheer number of people killed by Islamist extremists ― a total of 90 people killed ― was higher than the death toll at the hands of right-wing extremists ― 79 people killed."
"However, the sheer number of people killed by Islamist extremists - a total of 90 people killed - was higher than the death toll at the hands of right-wing extremists - 79 people killed."
Also, if you look at the map graphic provided, most of the right-wing terror are done by "sovereign citizens." Most of the ones that aren't are generally people setting fires to mosques and abortion clinics.
Also worth noting there's vastly more right-identified people in the USA than Muslims (by at least 30x), so a direct comparison isn't remotely fair. But even then, the Right is still less lethal - statistically.
Originally posted by Raptor22
I'm a little confused about the intent of the article. I can't tell if it's supposed to come off as making Muslims look better or worse.On one hand it's basically saying to us - hey Muslims aren't as bad of a group as u might think, here's another group that commits even more terrorists attacks than them.
On the other hand, the group that they're comparing Muslims to are freaking white supremacist groups. Groups whose core ideals revolve around hate.
It seems more of a backhanded compliment than anything, basically telling us that at least Muslims aren't as bad as the Aryan Nation and the Klan (i mean really, how shitty of a compliment is that) and they've committed less attacks, but then throw this in there also.
"However, the sheer number of people killed by Islamist extremists ― a total of 90 people killed ― was higher than the death toll at the hands of right-wing extremists ― 79 people killed."
The intent was indeed to try to say Muslims are not as bad as you think. They would be correct if we were just worried about America. We do not want to get to a level where we have a shitload of Muslim attacks like Europe and the Middle East do. All in all it's failed attempt IMO. People are worried about this stuff coming here and occurring at a higher rate.
The Islamists also still end up with a higher body count...to nobody's surprise.
There is a problem with islam worldwide. There is a huge population that don't reside in the USA that think sharia is good, that apostates should be killed along with gays, lets not forget that beating your wife is ok or a woman that has been raped......
Wahoo Murica is safe from radical islam atm..........
Re: Most of Anerica's terrorists are White and not Muslim
Originally posted by Darth Thor
New Study shows majority of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil are not by Muslims. But by White Supremacists:http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_594c46e4e4b0da2c731a84df/amp
Let's see a few things about the article:
1.) "However, the sheer number of people killed by Islamist extremists ¯ a total of 90 people killed ¯ was higher than the death toll at the hands of right-wing extremists ¯ 79 people killed." So Islamic Terrorism is more deadly. Also...no lists of attacks provided so kind of hard to dig through the facts.
2.) They keep saying far right extremist but the example they dive for is of Dylann Roof. You know, Roof. The guy who loves to burn American flags because that's what people on the right love to do. I'm curious as to why they don't provide any real examples. Maybe it's because they try to label anyone a right wing extremist who goes on a shooting spree despite their being little to no evidence to suggest such a thing. You know, like they did with James Holmes and how they tried to link him to the tea party.
3.) Also, Huffpo. Huffpo? Huffpo claims lying is ok, as long as you're promoting an agenda.
I think a better wording for the OP's thread title is Most of America's terrorists are right-wing Christians and not Muslims.
That is correct by the way. NRA and Pro Life scum have murdered many people in the US. There's also Religious types who advocate murder/assault/imprisonment for Gays. I'm thinking about pastors like Charles Worley and Curtis Knapp. There's the terrorist organisation Operation Rescue National; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Save_America
They have a hate media outlet (FOX) who promote outright lies and misleading propaganda to stir up their retards to violence.
FOX was responsible for the murder of abortion doctor George Tiller in 2009. Bill O'Reilly called him "Tiller the Killer" at least twenty times and this incitement paid off. Also, by the way, the Seth Rich murder fantasy springs from a worthless liar. Ten years ago, Rod Wheeler, then styled a “Fox News crime analyst,” appeared on the “The O’Reilly Factor” to report that “all over the country” hundreds of gangs of pink pistol-packing lesbians were terrorizing victims.
www.thedailybeast.com/how-i-got-fox...t-lesbian-gangs
www.sfgate.com/news/article/Lesbian...ill-2582057.php
The 700 club, fronted by Bible whore Pat Robertson, made up the audacious lie that Gay men in San Francisco use special rings to give AIDS to unsuspecting people who shake their hands.
You see what the purpose of this crap leads to..