Originally posted by socool8520
Why would you bring a child to a robbery?
Because they're scumbag idiots?
CRAWFORD, New York - A couple arrested for a home invasion robbery brought the woman’s 2-year-old son along for the ride, police said.
David Morris, 38, and Alyssa Brown, 21, have been charged with burglary, robbery, grand larceny and assault, authorities said. Brown, whose toddler was in the getaway car, has also been charged with child endangerment, according to police. -snip
Here's another caught on vid:
YouTube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6apc94UxuU4
What are these white people thinking? One thing to be a shitty thief, but to endanger your child for profit. Come on.
Originally posted by RobtardI'm not necessarily saying he should have shot the person in this particular case, but I think your wording here is disingenuous.
I like how the well known micropenis boy believes the proper punishment for a non-violent theft attempt is death. I mean, just how impossibly small is Vansonbee's sad little incel penis anyways?
maybe technically true, but still vague enough to be disingenuous IMO.
"non-violent theft" sounds petty enough. shoplifting is also non violent theft. but there is a world of difference between a B&E and shoplifting.
and the gruesome reality is that B&E's are treated as a much more potentially deadly situation because that is the reality of the situation. Many times if someone is willing to break into a place they do so armed and with the potential outcome of shooting anyone that they find inside should things go wrong. So if you get shot breaking into a place - you basically had it coming. Once again, am I saying the shooter was necessarily right to do so in this case? No, haven't really looked into it. But if you are breaking into houses and you aren't contemplating the fact that you might get shot doing so then tough luck for you. Here's a Darwin award for your profound recklessness.