Originally posted by SurturBut you do understand why the "But Trump" is justified right? If Trump lost the election, I would agree with you - there's no reason to continue referencing him. But unfortunately trump won, so you have to deal with people being upset with his behavior and you have to deal with people being upset with trump supporters for tolerating that behavior.
This doesn't mean he needs to be inserted into every single story.Let him roam free a bit before he goes back to staying rent free in your minds.
Originally posted by Firefly218
But you do understand why the "But Trump" is justified right? If Trump lost the election, I would agree with you - there's no reason to continue referencing him. But unfortunately trump won, so you have to deal with people being upset with his behavior and you have to deal with people being upset with trump supporters for tolerating that behavior.
Lol no it's not justified. Not every single thing needs to be about Trump. Stop being such babies and invoking Trump whenever you feel a tantrum coming on.
Originally posted by Robtard
Why do you hold a uni professor to a higher standard than the POTUS?Don't get me wrong, he's a stupid dick. But point stands.
The dude was part of an anti-capitalist organization, thinks the police should be abolished, encourages rioting, said a police officer who lost his job for bodyslamming a black student should be shot, expressed disgust over someone voluntarily giving their seat on a plane to a soldier, blamed the Las Vegas shooting on "the white supremacist patriarchy," etc. He's more than a stupid dick, he has an actively horrifying ideology.
I'm not a fan of Trump's rhetoric myself, but holy **** the two are not equivalent in this regard.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'm not though, because I think this guy is worse than Trump.The dude was part of an anti-capitalist organization, thinks the police should be abolished, encourages rioting, said a police officer who lost his job for bodyslamming a black student should be shot, expressed disgust over someone voluntarily giving their seat on a plane to a soldier, blamed the Las Vegas shooting on "the white supremacist patriarchy," etc. He's more than a stupid dick, he has an actively horrifying ideology.
I'm not a fan of Trump's rhetoric myself, but holy **** the two are not equivalent in this regard.
You think some shitty rando uni professor twitter troll is worse than Trump and what he's capable of? Good lord.
Originally posted by Firefly218
But you do understand why the "But Trump" is justified right? If Trump lost the election, I would agree with you - there's no reason to continue referencing him. But unfortunately trump won, so you have to deal with people being upset with his behavior and you have to deal with people being upset with trump supporters for tolerating that behavior.
You just can't say "mean things" about Trump without some Trumper losing it. You don't even need to say mean things, they often just imagine you do and flip out.
They should do better for themselves. Imho, Surtur definitely should try and do better for himself.
Originally posted by Robtard
You think some shitty rando uni professor twitter troll is worse than Trump and what he's capable of? Good lord.
The point I was making was that you said I was holding his position to a higher standard in Trump's position, to which my response is if Trump had rhetoric and ideology as horrible as this dude's I would very desperately want him out of office, but that because his rhetoric is not as bad as this guy's you're drawing a false equivalency to assume I hold professorship to a higher standard and to assume I'm accepting shit from Trump that I wouldn't accept from a college professor even though there's no equivalency between the rhetoric.