Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Flyattractor922 pages
Originally posted by Adam_PoE

Why do Gay Men lean towards being so intolerant and unpleasant to be around?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Why do Gay Men lean towards being so intolerant and unpleasant to be around? [/B]

Only the flamers. 🙂

True story: Gay men threw gay men under the bus. Look up the start of the movement in the 1980's, they outright say they need to marginalize subgroups the general public can't relate to. And to this day, the movement just cater's to "affluent" middle class looking gays.

Which makes sense, since the founders were white professionals, like a surgeon, who were into it for themselves (For fear of the aids epidemic backlash.)

Originally posted by cdtm
Only the flamers. 🙂

True story: Gay men threw gay men under the bus. Look up the start of the movement in the 1980's, they outright say they need to marginalize subgroups the general public can't relate to. And to this day, the movement just cater's to "affluent" middle class looking gays.

Which makes sense, since the founders were white professionals, like a surgeon, who were into it for themselves (For fear of the aids epidemic backlash.)

Didn’t know that.

Originally posted by SquallX
Agreed. But the difference is pretty big. One shirt, people might look at you weird. Where as with the other one, you will be insulted, or worse, assaulted.

No, no, you're right. You wouldn't get assaulted for the Hope stuff from Obama.

I live in the most conservative US state. Unless you want to abort babies, they are very tolerant, in person, of differing political beliefs.There are extremes. But from my experience, the leftists are quite intolerant of thinking that is outside of their set of comfort.

Originally posted by cdtm
Only the flamers. 🙂

True story: Gay men threw gay men under the bus. Look up the start of the movement in the 1980's, they outright say they need to marginalize subgroups the general public can't relate to. And to this day, the movement just cater's to "affluent" middle class looking gays.

Which makes sense, since the founders were white professionals, like a surgeon, who were into it for themselves (For fear of the aids epidemic backlash.)

My bisexual pals talk about this. "Bisexual? F*ck off. We don't care about you."

And it is "white, middle class, educated, gay man."

YouTube video

It saddens me this isn't that far off from how real life SJWs behave.

All the people bitching about Ben Carson's dining set

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/01/politics/carson-dining-room-canceled/index.html

Originally posted by Blindside12
All the people bitching about Ben Carson's dining set

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/01/politics/carson-dining-room-canceled/index.html

Ummm, I'm confused. If $1000 is mere crumbs, surely 31k is a reasonable price for a dining set. Why they so mad?

YouTube video

^Liberals Owned.

The founding ideology of this country was liberalism.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
YouTube video

lol, he could have done better and used my argument about Australia: shifted murders from guns to everything but guns and homicides in Australia hit a near 20 year peak almost a decade after their gun ban.

But other than that, a good vid.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
The founding ideology of this country was liberalism.

Liberalism which the country was founded on ie John Lock etc, is not what liberalism is today. A theifdom came in and took over.

Originally posted by Blindside12
Liberalism which the country was founded on ie John Lock etc, is not what liberalism is today. A theifdom came in and took over.

Well then liberalism today is a misuse of the term.

It is, thats why its a theifdom, and its easier to type then progressive marxism, but if it means something to you, I can do that.

Originally posted by dadudemon
lol, he could have done better and used my argument about Australia: shifted murders from guns to everything but guns and homicides in Australia hit a near 20 year peak almost a decade after their gun ban.

But other than that, a good vid.

The best part is the one about England.

People here love to site England had so little shooting, yet competly gloss over all those acid attacks.

Originally posted by dadudemon
lol, he could have done better and used my argument about Australia: shifted murders from guns to everything but guns and homicides in Australia hit a near 20 year peak almost a decade after their gun ban.

But other than that, a good vid.

What I love is how leftists always say they don't really wanna take all the guns...and yet also at the same time point to Australia when it comes to gun control. And Obama himself, while president, praised Australia for it.

Either they don't know the main way Australia accomplished what they did...or they just don't care.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
YouTube video

So why is no leftist here going to try to debunk this since this goes against everything they believe, facts be damned.

No one wants to interrupt your proud boys circle jerk. It is called "manners."

Originally posted by Surtur
What I love is how leftists always say they don't really wanna take all the guns...and yet also at the same time point to Australia when it comes to gun control. And Obama himself, while president, praised Australia for it.

Either they don't know the main way Australia accomplished what they did...or they just don't care.

We all know how Australia did it. Buyback program, they recalled all dangerous weapons like the public hazard they were.

This Australian chick is worth listening to IMO...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1r1yECONZE