Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Started by Surtur922 pages

Good god...

Thousands march in protest after holocaust survivor stabbed, set on fire in gruesome Paris murder

She survives the holocaust only to be f*cking stabbed and set on fire. And I'm gonna guess this was another outstanding member of the religion of peace.

"Just streets away from Knoll’s residence, a 66-year-old Jewish woman was murdered roughly a year ago. The victim, Sarah Halimi, was an Orthodox Jewish physician and kindergarten teacher who was thrown out a window after being beaten in her apartment.

A neighbor was also accused in the killing of Halimi, and other residents of the complex testified that they heard the suspect yell “Allahu Akbar” during the attack. Halimi was the only Jewish resident in the building, according to relatives."

Boil the guy in bacon grease.

Originally posted by BackFire
My personal opinion is that I think it should be left up to each individual city to decide how much they want to cooperate with ICE.

Too me, I fall in the middle.

Yes they should cooperate when it comes to druggies, killers and the likes. No, when it has to do with someone trying to feed themselves and their families.

At the same time right, if you’ve been in this country for more than 10 years illegally and you refuse to even at least try becoming a legal citizen, I can’t say I feel sorry if you’re deported. Especially when DACA was first implemented.

Originally posted by SquallX
Too me, I fall in the middle.

Yes they should cooperate when it comes to druggies, killers and the likes. No, when it has to do with someone trying to feed themselves and their families.

At the same time right, if you’ve been in this country for more than 10 years illegally and you refuse to even at least try becoming a legal citizen, I can’t say I feel sorry if you’re deported. Especially when DACA was first implemented.

This is what gets me. Sometimes when you see grown ass adults getting deported one thing you hear is "they've been here since they were a kid!".

So if they've been here since they were a kid why in gods name have they not started on the path to legal citizenship?

Originally posted by Surtur
This is what gets me. Sometimes when you see grown ass adults getting deported one thing you hear is "they've been here since they were a kid!".

So if they've been here since they were a kid why in gods name have they not started on the path to legal citizenship?

That shit actually does confuse me.

Even if you don’t go for a citizenship, you could just go for you’re green card. If you have you’re green card, and you’re not a criminal, your good.

Originally posted by Surtur
Damn Kirk you triggered him into ignoring you. I've seen this kid whine for 35 pages at someone and not block them. You must have hit a nerve.

^^ pretend triumph from the emotional gimp. making new special friends, squirt?

Did DDM & nib really trigger firefly so badly that he asked to be banned?

That's some hier-tier an hero quality shit right there.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Did DDM & nib really trigger firefly so badly that he asked to be banned?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Profs warn that 'commitment to empirical science' hurts women

[b]A recent academic journal article claims that "meritocratic ideology" and "depoliticized" classroom environments contribute to a sense of exclusion and isolation among female students.

The professors argue that the emphasis on "meritocracy," "individualism," and "technical prowess" in engineering all contribute to a "masculine culture" that marginalizes women.

Four professors are warning that the “hegemony of meritocratic ideology” and other manifestations of “masculine culture” in engineering courses are detrimental to women.

Though some scholars argue that engineering culture upholds hegemonic masculinity, Serron and her team take a different approach, arguing that it is not specifically “hegemonic masculinity” that hurts women but rather “meritocratic ideology.”

“Socialization into the ideologies of meritocracy and individualism, coupled with a valorization of ‘technical’ prowess at the expense of ‘socially focused’ work processes, depoliticizes the gendered structure of the profession,” they write.

And then at the end part lol

“Rather than telling what [some researchers] describe as a subversive story...these women engineers are often reproductive agents of the ideology of meritocracy, helping perpetuate existing relations of power and inequality,” they write.

“Rather than resisting hegemonic meritocracy, these brilliant young women engineers are its active promoters,” they say, later adding that this commitment to meritocracy undermines women’s best interests, as it unwittingly reinforces the “gendered consequences of engineering professional hegemony.”

What is this horseshit lol. That's kind of insulting to women that meritocracy somehow oppresses women lol. [/B]

I just promoted a woman, a female software engineer, to Head of Mobile Development.

She was the best candidate. She's straight. White. Married. Has 3 children.

And she absolutely despises this type of SJW bullshit. She gave me the speech about how it should all be based on meritocracy, education and skills, and the ability to do the job (experience) but nothing else because she doesn't want to work with ignorant and/or incompetent people. When dealing with absurdly tight deadlines, you don't want a token woman or minority that you were forced to hire due to quotas you had to fill, you want the best of the best by your side and if they just so happen to be a "minority", great!

Competent female engineers don't want to be coddled or be given jobs they were not the most qualified for. They want to be given jobs and promotions because they deserve it based on their qualifications and performance merits.

"But, dadudemon, you don't speak for women and you're mansplaining."

I literally and directly speak for the women who work for me. Suck it! 😄

Originally posted by BackFire
Hey I live in Huntington Beach.

Then it should be renamed to Cuntington beach. uhuh

Originally posted by dadudemon
I just promoted a woman, a female software engineer, to Head of Mobile Development.

She was the best candidate. She's straight. White. Married. Has 3 children.

And she absolutely despises this type of SJW bullshit. She gave me the speech about how it should all be based on meritocracy, education and skills, and the ability to do the job (experience) but nothing else because she doesn't want to work with ignorant and/or incompetent people. When dealing with absurdly tight deadlines, you don't want a token woman or minority that you were forced to hire due to quotas you had to fill, you want the best of the best by your side and if they just so happen to be a "minority", great!

Competent female engineers don't want to be coddled or be given jobs they were not the most qualified for. They want to be given jobs and promotions because they deserve it based on their qualifications and performance merits.

"But, dadudemon, you don't speak for women and you're mansplaining."

I literally and directly speak for the women who work for me. Suck it! 😄


I feel like women are the most woke demographic that SJWs claim to uphold so to speak, and I think I know the reason why.

If you're a racial minority it's easy to isolate yourself from say white people for example, assuming you aren't mixed race you grow up in a minority family, likely in an area with a lot of minorities, possibly within the structure of a cultural element correlated to that group, and then you can marry or seek a sexual or romantic relationship with other minorities.

If you're LGBT, you can sequester yourself with other gay people or "allies" and sure you grow up in a family, but there's a very real chance you can isolate yourself from that if they disapprove of LGBT stuff.

If you're a woman however and you have two parents, you grow up in a family with a father, maybe one or more brothers, unless you go to an all girl's school you have to interact with boys, and when you're in the work force you have to interact with a lot of men. And if you're straight woman and looking for a relationship you actually have to get intimate with a man.

Basically I think women as a demographic are less susceptible to SJW influence because as a consequence of biology women by necessity have to actually be seriously integrated with the other demographic in the domain of gender, whereas again racial minorities can stay sequestered with other racial minorities to a greater extent than women can with other women, and gay people can withdraw more into the "gay community" and detach themselves from their parents if thy don't accept them.

I think this goes the other way too, since white people can sequester themselves with other white people, or straight people who aren't enmeshed in LGBT stuff can sequester themselves with similar straight people, but any men who grow up with a mother, or go to school with half of the people there being women, or who actually want to get with women romantically and sexually have to be integrated with the female population.

Honestly I think that's the reason why the groups of men and women are less drawn into the identity game than the demographic groups in other areas such as race and sexuality, because men and women can't retreat into a bubble with the same ease that the other groups can.

Originally posted by Robtard
But if the police; let alone the FBI had gone into his home and confiscated his guns and it had been made public, the NRA would have ranted how Cruz's 1st, 2nd, 4th and 14th Amendment Rights were being violated by an overreaching State and Federal government and you people would have agreed with them.

I raised this in the "Mass Shootings in America" thread. People were screeching about the FBI not doing anything, but what could they have done? At that point, he had not broken any laws. We do not just suspend the Constitution, and arrest people on suspicion.

He wasn't convicted of breaking any laws, but IIRC he actually broke the law by threatening people and was reported to law enforcement but they didn't actually enforce the law.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
He wasn't convicted of breaking any laws, but IIRC he actually broke the law by threatening people and was reported to law enforcement but they didn't actually enforce the law.

Which is the amusing thing, they fail to enforce the laws we already have...yet leftists think even more laws are going to magically help.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
YouTube video

Lol...

U.K. Police May Investigate Comedian Jonathan Pie for Free Speech Joke

The person who originally reported the guy apparently wasn't actually offended, they were just curious at just how dystopian the UK was becoming. I'd say he has his answer lol.

Pffft Stupid Americans, in the more enlightened Europe we've already recognized the common sense gun laws of not having an armed populous, because we aren't dumb enough to make the idiotic assertion "Oh we need guns because the government could go tyranical!" as if that's something that could ever happen... oh wait...

If the argument is 'citizens being murdered via guns' vs 'but what if the government becomes tyrannical' in regards to gun ownership, well, I think we can see which one is more of a concern/reality and which one is more of a fear-tactic nowadays.

We know which is more likely, but we also know which is orders of magnitude worse if it actually happens.

The main point I'm making is partly that I find it really funny when some Europeans get really snooty at us for our laws when they have shit like this going on.

It should be hard to have the ethos of "Look how uncivilized their country is" when your country convicts people for making jokes.

There is also the Fact that Robbie and his "ilk" LIE about Gun Facts to push their Fascist Narrative.

Okay so we have indoctrination here. It's not even up for debate. We have a middle school teacher that mandated a specific position to his students.

Teacher assigns students to write gun control letters to Congress. Parents aren’t happy.

There is simply no excuse for this. He told them to write letters to lawmakers to persuade them to pass tighter gun control.

Most parents only found out after the assignment had been turned in. If the teacher mailed the letters isn't that a violation of free speech?

Either way the teacher needs to be fired IMO. It would have been perfectly acceptable to ask them to pick a side on the gun control issue and write a letter to a lawmaker about it, it is not acceptable to tell them they need to choose a specific side.