Originally posted by Putinbot1
I also use growth lol, I'm about to start a six-month course of 2iu's daily. I get HRT because of my steroid abuse and run courses between blood tests. Hey, I've got grown-up kids, who cares, I'm not having any more...
After a certain age, as long as you don't care about fertility, and as long as you are handling your cycles well (lipds, liver tox if you're using hepatotoxic-AAS), there's no reason to worry.
However, Dr. Jose Antonio has made it clear that anymore than 4IUs a week of GH will cause acromelalgia. He's said to keep it under 4IUs a week...as he thinks that will prevent acromegaly for almost everyone.
At your levels of dosing, you will most likely develop acromegaly:
Here is such one documented and studied case at 2IUs a day:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14707471
And here's a bit more research, in general, of recreational use of HGH:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104052/
Interestingly enough, the cocktail you're using seems to be somewhat common (x, AAS, and HGH).
Originally posted by dadudemonI've been doing 2 iu's for six months on and off for years. My bigger worry with growth is I had a few melanomas a while back all cut out and everything sorted but growth can trigger cancer. But, better to burn out than fade away.
After a certain age, as long as you don't care about fertility, and as long as you are handling your cycles well (lipds, liver tox if you're using hepatotoxic-AAS), there's no reason to worry.However, Dr. Jose Antonio has made it clear that anymore than 4IUs a week of GH will cause acromelalgia. He's said to keep it under 4IUs a week...as he thinks that will prevent acromegaly for almost everyone.
At your levels of dosing, you will most likely develop acromegaly:
Here is such one documented and studied case at 2IUs a day:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14707471
And here's a bit more research, in general, of recreational use of HGH:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104052/
Interestingly enough, the cocktail you're using seems to be somewhat common (x, AAS, and HGH).
Originally posted by Surtur
Designer of 3D printed gun will distribute gun plans despite court orderHmmm.
Yeah, this is getting into the FA and SA debate as it hits on both.
Originally posted by SurturYeah, without ammo... they are plastic toys.
Designer of 3D printed gun will distribute gun plans despite court orderHmmm.
Originally posted by RobtardI'm not pro-gun, I think US gun laws are mental but these things, I suspect are as likely to injure the person firing it as the target. I mean seriously my two d printer often ****s up.
He better hope a murder isn't carried out with one of those guns, they could potentially use that to hold him liable and make an example out of him. The gun lobby/NRA has a ridiculous amount of power in our government.
You can't print an entire gun, at least I can't imagine it's possible. The barrel and firing pin would have to be metal I would imagine, likely other parts as well.
So to me this is little different than someone whittling a gun stock out of wood. That's legal I believe, so why not this. Answer: Because the NRA and gun lobby see it as a threat to their potential earnings, especially in the future. I say f**k those pieces of shit.
Originally posted by Robtard
You can't print an entire gun, at least I can't imagine it's possible. The barrel and firing pin would have to be metal I would imagine, likely other parts as well.So to me this is little different than someone whittling a gun stock out of wood. That's legal I believe, so why not this. Answer: Because the NRA and gun lobby see it as a threat to their potential earnings, especially in the future. I say f**k those pieces of shit.
If it is the same dude, the guns are good for a few shots before they break. He was working on larger guns like rifles, as well.
Originally posted by dadudemon
If it is the same dude, the guns are good for a few shots before they break. He was working on larger guns like rifles, as well.
Okay, thanks. Wasn't aware.
My opinion doesn't change though and you know I'm pro-gun rights, but not crazy "zero regulations!" pro-gun rights. This should still fall under the local laws, if I can make my own parts like a rifle stock and its legal in my state, 3D printing them should be legal as well.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
As I understand it and I may be wrong it's a one shot gun and isn't reusable. I think everything is plastic.
So the NRA who pushes for as few guns laws as possible is worried about a single shot/use gun, but couldn't give two shits about an assault rifle.
Yep, f--k you, NRA.
Originally posted by Robtard
You can't print an entire gun, at least I can't imagine it's possible. The barrel and firing pin would have to be metal I would imagine, likely other parts as well.So to me this is little different than someone whittling a gun stock out of wood. That's legal I believe, so why not this. Answer: Because the NRA and gun lobby see it as a threat to their potential earnings, especially in the future. I say f**k those pieces of shit.
YouTube video
Damn... looks like this'll be an interesting one...
And it's coming out tomorrow, it'll make a nice housewarming gift for me.